Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Surgical Swine Model of Chronic Cardiac Ischemia Treated by Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Published on: March 27, 2018
Complete Versus Incomplete Revascularization in Elderly Patients With Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and
Cesar Intriago1, Cristopher-Josué Escudero2, Jesús Endara-Mina2
1Research, Larkin Community Hospital, South Miami, USA.
Insights
Complete revascularization (CR) does not appear to offer benefits over incomplete revascularization (IR) for older adults undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This meta-analysis found no significant reduction in mortality or adverse events in patients aged 70 and above.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Geriatric Medicine
Background:
- Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a leading cause of death in the US.
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a standard treatment for acute CAD.
- Older adults have higher cardiovascular risks and unique treatment considerations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of complete revascularization (CR) versus incomplete revascularization (IR) in patients aged 70 and older.
- To compare major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), myocardial infarction (MI), and all-cause mortality (ACM) between CR and IR.
- To assess the impact of revascularization strategies on cardiovascular outcomes in the elderly population.
Main Methods:
- A literature search identified 15 relevant studies.
- Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) and ROBINS-I tools.
- A meta-analysis was conducted to synthesize the findings.
Main Results:
- The meta-analysis did not demonstrate the superiority of complete revascularization (CR).
- CR did not show a significant benefit in reducing all-cause mortality (ACM) or myocardial infarction (MI).
- No significant reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) was observed with CR compared to IR in older adults.
Conclusions:
- Complete revascularization (CR) does not appear to provide additional benefits over incomplete revascularization (IR) for patients aged 70 and older undergoing PCI.
- Current evidence does not support CR as a superior strategy for improving mortality or reducing adverse events in this specific demographic.
- Further research may be needed to clarify optimal revascularization strategies for elderly patients with CAD.
Abstract:
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of mortality in the United States, and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is established as the standard after an acute episode of CAD. This review assessed the use of complete revascularization (CR) or incomplete revascularization (IR) in older adults, who present a higher cardiovascular risk. The aim is to define the effectiveness of both procedures in this population, focusing on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), myocardial infarction (MI), and all-cause mortality (ACM). A literature search identified 15 studies, evaluated using the Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool and the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions I (ROBINS-I) tool for bias risk. Despite positive results in recent studies, this meta-analysis does not show the superiority of CR, demonstrating a lack of benefit in reducing mortality, myocardial infarction, and adverse events in the ≥ 70-year-old age group.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Ischemic Heart Disease: Overview
Atherosclerosis, the primary malefactor, orchestrates this dangerous condition. It manifests as the accumulation of fatty deposits, akin to insidious plaques, within arterial walls. As time elapses, these plaques metamorphose, hardening and...
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care

