Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2025

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
Do You Speak Science? Dialect and its Role in Research Training.
Jordan Trachtenberg1, Hwa Young Lee1, Cheryl Anderson1
1Cancer Prevention Research Training Program, Department of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Trainees using non-standard English dialects reported more discomfort in research settings than peers. Mentors perceived greater mentoring challenges for these trainees, suggesting language variety impacts academic experiences.
Area of Science:
- Sociolinguistics
- Higher Education Studies
- Scientific Communication
Background:
- Communication skills are vital for research career success.
- The impact of non-standard English varieties (dialects/sociolects) on academic research training is understudied.
- Existing interventions rarely address language variety as a barrier.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the influence of non-standard English varieties on scientific communication (SciComm) in academic research.
- To examine trainee and mentor perceptions regarding language variety in research environments.
- To determine if language variety is a significant factor in trainee comfort and perceived barriers.
Main Methods:
- Surveyed 124 mentor/trainee dyads across 4 time points.
- Analyzed data from 139 English speakers and 16 bilingual trainees reporting a home language variety.
- Assessed trainee self-reported comfort and mentor-perceived barriers in SciComm.
Main Results:
- Trainees from non-standard English backgrounds reported greater discomfort in research environments compared to Standard Academic English (SAE) speakers.
- Mentors perceived higher barriers to mentoring trainees who spoke non-standard varieties, irrespective of trainee ethnicity or class.
- Discomfort levels reported by non-standard variety speakers exceeded those identifying with minority ethnic groups or first-generation status.
Conclusions:
- Language variety significantly impacts mentor-mentee interactions and trainee experiences in academic research.
- Non-standard English varieties may be a more sensitive indicator of trainee discomfort than race-ethnicity or first-generation status.
- Findings suggest a need for interventions addressing language diversity in scientific training to improve inclusivity and support.
Related Concept Videos
Language and Cognition
Ethics in Research
The Scientific Method
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
Psychology as a Science
The scientific method in psychology involves six critical steps: making observations, formulating hypotheses, conducting tests, analyzing...
Naturalistic Observations
Deductive Reasoning
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...

