Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2025

11:27
Analysis of SCAP N-glycosylation and Trafficking in Human Cells
Published on: November 8, 2016
8.7K
Regulatory interactions between APOBEC3B N- and C-terminal domains.
Mac Kevin E Braza1, Özlem Demir1, Surl-Hee Ahn2
1Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA.
Biorxiv : the Preprint Server for Biology
|December 23, 2024
Summary
The full-length APOBEC3B (A3B) protein's active site opens more frequently due to interactions between its domains. This structural insight into A3B dynamics may reveal new cancer therapy targets.
Area of Science:
- Structural Biology
- Molecular Dynamics
- Cancer Research
Background:
- APOBEC3B (A3B) DNA deaminase is crucial in tumor evolution via DNA mutations.
- Previous studies resolved individual N- and C-terminal domains (NTD/CTD) of A3B but not the full-length (fl-A3B).
- The A3B C-terminal domain (A3Bctd) active site is often observed in a closed conformation, hindering mechanistic understanding.
Purpose of the Study:
- To elucidate the structural dynamics of full-length APOBEC3B (fl-A3B).
- To investigate the active site opening mechanism of fl-A3B and compare it to the truncated A3Bctd.
- To identify how domain interactions influence A3B's conformational flexibility.
Main Methods:
- Integrative structural biology for fl-A3B model building.
- Conventional and Gaussian accelerated molecular dynamics (MD) simulations.
- Weighted ensemble methods to explore active site dynamics.
Main Results:
- Developed and refined models of fl-A3B.
- Compared dynamics between fl-A3B and A3Bctd.
- Identified that NTD-CTD interface interactions increase the frequency of fl-A3B active site opening.
Conclusions:
- The structural dynamics of fl-A3B are influenced by inter-domain interactions.
- The enhanced active site opening in fl-A3B provides new insights into A3B mechanisms.
- Findings may inform the development of novel therapeutic strategies targeting A3B in cancer.
Related Concept Videos
Regulation of Nuclear Protein Sorting
2.4K
Nuclear protein sorting regulates nucleus composition and gene expression, crucial for determining the fate of a eukaryotic cell. Hence, the entry and exit of molecules across the nuclear envelope is a tightly controlled process. Nuclear protein sorting can be inhibited by one of the following ways: 1) masking cargo signal sequences, 2) modifying the nuclear receptor's affinity for cargo, 3) controlling the nuclear pore size, 4) retaining the cargo during its transit to the cytosol or the...
2.4K
Assembly of Signaling Complexes
5.7K
Multiprotein signaling complexes are formed in a dynamic process involving protein-protein interactions at the cytoplasmic domain of transmembrane receptors or enzymatic and non-enzymatic proteins associated with the receptor. These complexes ensure the activation and propagation of intracellular signals that regulate cell functions.
Interaction domains in cell signaling
Interaction domains recognize exposed features of their binding partners containing post-translationally modified sequences,...
Interaction domains in cell signaling
Interaction domains recognize exposed features of their binding partners containing post-translationally modified sequences,...
5.7K
Covalently Linked Protein Regulators
6.8K
Proteins can undergo many types of post-translational modifications, often in response to changes in their environment. These modifications play an important role in the function and stability of these proteins. Covalently linked molecules include functional groups, such as methyl, acetyl, and phosphate groups, and also small proteins, such as ubiquitin. There are around 200 different types of covalent regulators that have been identified.
These groups modify specific amino acids in a protein....
These groups modify specific amino acids in a protein....
6.8K
Regulation of the Unfolded Protein Response
2.4K
Inositol-requiring kinase one or IRE1 is the most conserved eukaryotic unfolded protein response (UPR) receptor. It is a type I transmembrane protein kinase receptor with a distinctive site-specific RNase activity. As the binding mechanics of the misfolded proteins with the N-terminal domain of IRE-1 are unclear, three binding models — direct, indirect, and allosteric -- are proposed for receptor activation. Nevertheless, it is known that once a misfolded protein associates with IRE1, it...
2.4K
GPCRs Regulate Adenylyl Cylase Activity
5.3K
Some GPCRs transmit signals through adenylyl cyclase (AC), a transmembrane enzyme. AC helps synthesize second messenger cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP). AC catalyzes cyclization reaction and converts ATP to cAMP by releasing a pyrophosphate. The pyrophosphate is further hydrolyzed to phosphate by the enzyme pyrophosphatase, which drives cAMP synthesis to completion. However, cAMP is rapidly degraded to 5′ AMP by the enzymes phosphodiesterase (PDE), preventing overstimulation of...
5.3K
Rab Proteins
3.9K
Rab proteins constitute the largest family of monomeric GTPases, of which 70 members are present in humans. Rab proteins and their effectors regulate consecutive stages of vesicle transport such as vesicle transport, docking, and fusion to the correct recipient membrane.
Rab proteins switch between a cytosolic, GDP-bound inactive state and a membrane-anchored, GTP-bound active state. By themselves, Rabs show slow rates of GDP/GTP exchange and GTP hydrolysis. Thus, Rab proteins are considered...
Rab proteins switch between a cytosolic, GDP-bound inactive state and a membrane-anchored, GTP-bound active state. By themselves, Rabs show slow rates of GDP/GTP exchange and GTP hydrolysis. Thus, Rab proteins are considered...
3.9K

