Prognostic value of beat-to-beat blood pressure variability parameters in patients after mechanical thrombectomy

Ying-Ying Sun1, Shu-Yan Pang1, Yang Qu1

  • 1Stroke Center, Department of Neurology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Chang Chun, China.

The relationship of beat-to-beat blood pressure variability (BPV) with prognosis after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is unclear. Consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion treated with and without MT matched 1:1 by age, sex, and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale were included. Beat-to-beat BPV was calculated for both systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) as standard deviation, coefficient of variation, successive variation (SV), and average real variability (ARV) at 24-72 h after MT. Additionally, hour-to-hour (first 24 h after MT) and day-by-day BPV (first 7 days after MT) were also measured. The outcome was modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 months. Of 168 patients, 84 patients received MT and 84 did not. MT closely correlated with lower beat-to-beat BPV parameters. Beat-to-beat SBP-SV and SBP-ARV were significantly higher in patients with unfavorable outcome than in those with favorable outcome (median 3.40 vs 2.71; P = 0.016; median 2.81 vs 2.20, P = 0.003). After adjusting for confounders, higher beat-to-beat SBP-SV and SBP-ARV were independently associated with unfavorable outcome in patients with MT (all P < 0.05). However, no association was found between hour-to-hour and day-by-day BPV and outcome at 3 months (P > 0.05). The patients with MT had lower beat-to-beat BPV values in the acute phase, which indicated that MT has a positive effect on beat-to-beat BPV. Furthermore, beat-to-beat BPV, rather than hour-to-hour or day-by-day BPV, is an independent risk factor for unfavorable outcome in patients after MT.

Related Concept Videos

Special considerations while measuring blood pressure01:28

Special considerations while measuring blood pressure

When assessing blood pressure (BP), healthcare professionals must consider various factors and potential unexpected outcomes to ensure accurate readings and provide proper patient care. Adhering to these guidelines is essential to achieving the most reliable results.
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
703
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure01:10

Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure

Accurate blood pressure assessment is crucial for diagnosing and managing various health conditions. To ensure the reliability of these measurements, healthcare professionals must adhere to standardized pre-procedural guidelines. These guidelines enhance patient safety and improve the overall quality of healthcare. The following steps are essential for obtaining accurate and consistent blood pressure readings, from using the appropriate tools to ensuring effective communication with the...
520
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)01:23

Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)

Measuring blood pressure is a fundamental skill in healthcare that aids in diagnosing and monitoring hypertension and other cardiovascular conditions. An aneroid sphygmomanometer, commonly used in clinical settings, offers a manual and precise method for blood pressure measurement. The technique for using this instrument involves specific steps that must be carefully executed to ensure accuracy. The following detailed description outlines a two-step technique for assessing blood pressure using...
651