Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2025

Real-Time Monitoring and Modulation of Blood Pressure in a Rabbit Model of Ischemic Stroke
Published on: February 10, 2023
Prognostic value of beat-to-beat blood pressure variability parameters in patients after mechanical thrombectomy
Ying-Ying Sun1, Shu-Yan Pang1, Yang Qu1
1Stroke Center, Department of Neurology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Chang Chun, China.
The relationship of beat-to-beat blood pressure variability (BPV) with prognosis after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is unclear. Consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion treated with and without MT matched 1:1 by age, sex, and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale were included. Beat-to-beat BPV was calculated for both systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) as standard deviation, coefficient of variation, successive variation (SV), and average real variability (ARV) at 24-72 h after MT. Additionally, hour-to-hour (first 24 h after MT) and day-by-day BPV (first 7 days after MT) were also measured. The outcome was modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 months. Of 168 patients, 84 patients received MT and 84 did not. MT closely correlated with lower beat-to-beat BPV parameters. Beat-to-beat SBP-SV and SBP-ARV were significantly higher in patients with unfavorable outcome than in those with favorable outcome (median 3.40 vs 2.71; P = 0.016; median 2.81 vs 2.20, P = 0.003). After adjusting for confounders, higher beat-to-beat SBP-SV and SBP-ARV were independently associated with unfavorable outcome in patients with MT (all P < 0.05). However, no association was found between hour-to-hour and day-by-day BPV and outcome at 3 months (P > 0.05). The patients with MT had lower beat-to-beat BPV values in the acute phase, which indicated that MT has a positive effect on beat-to-beat BPV. Furthermore, beat-to-beat BPV, rather than hour-to-hour or day-by-day BPV, is an independent risk factor for unfavorable outcome in patients after MT.
The relationship of beat-to-beat blood pressure variability (BPV) with prognosis after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is unclear. Consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion treated with and without MT matched 1:1 by age, sex, and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale were included. Beat-to-beat BPV was calculated for both systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) as standard deviation, coefficient of variation, successive variation (SV), and average real variability (ARV) at 24-72 h after MT. Additionally, hour-to-hour (first 24 h after MT) and day-by-day BPV (first 7 days after MT) were also measured. The outcome was modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 months. Of 168 patients, 84 patients received MT and 84 did not. MT closely correlated with lower beat-to-beat BPV parameters. Beat-to-beat SBP-SV and SBP-ARV were significantly higher in patients with unfavorable outcome than in those with favorable outcome (median 3.40 vs 2.71; P = 0.016; median 2.81 vs 2.20, P = 0.003). After adjusting for confounders, higher beat-to-beat SBP-SV and SBP-ARV were independently associated with unfavorable outcome in patients with MT (all P < 0.05). However, no association was found between hour-to-hour and day-by-day BPV and outcome at 3 months (P > 0.05). The patients with MT had lower beat-to-beat BPV values in the acute phase, which indicated that MT has a positive effect on beat-to-beat BPV. Furthermore, beat-to-beat BPV, rather than hour-to-hour or day-by-day BPV, is an independent risk factor for unfavorable outcome in patients after MT.
Related Concept Videos
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)

