Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2025

Quantification of the Immunosuppressant Tacrolimus on Dried Blood Spots Using LC-MS/MS
Published on: November 8, 2015
Evaluation of BCRP-Related DDIs Between Methotrexate and Cyclosporin A Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic
Stephan Schaller1, Ingrid Michon2, Vanessa Baier3
1ESQlabs GmbH, Saterland, Germany. stephan.schaller@esqlabs.com.
Background And Objective:
This study provides a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model-based analysis of the potential drug-drug interaction (DDI) between cyclosporin A (CsA), a breast cancer resistance protein transporter (BCRP) inhibitor, and methotrexate (MTX), a putative BCRP substrate.
Methods:
PBPK models for CsA and MTX were built using open-source tools and published data for both model building and for model verification and validation. The MTX and CsA PBPK models were evaluated for their application in simulating BCRP-related DDIs. A qualification of an introduced empirical uniform in vitro scaling factor of Ki values for transporter inhibition by CsA was conducted by using a previously developed model of rosuvastatin (sensitive index BCRP substrate), and assessing if corresponding DDI ratios were well captured.
Results:
Within the simulated DDI scenarios for MTX in the presence of CsA, the developed models could capture the observed changes in PK parameters as changes in the area under the curve ratios (area under the curve during DDI/area under the curve control) of 1.30 versus 1.31 observed and the DDI peak plasma concentration ratios (peak plasma concentration during DDI/peak plasma concentration control) of 1.07 versus 1.28 observed. The originally reported in vitro Ki values of CsA were scaled with the uniform qualified scaling factor for their use in the in vivo DDI simulations to correct for the low intracellular unbound fraction of the CsA effector concentration. The resulting predicted versus observed ratios of peak plasma concentration and area under the curve DDI ratios with MTX were 0.82 and 0.99, respectively, indicating adequate model accuracy and choice of a scaling factor to capture the observed DDI.
Conclusions:
All models have been comprehensively documented and made publicly available as tools to support the drug development and clinical research community and further community-driven model development.
More Related Videos
00:05A Semi-Quantitative Drug Affinity Responsive Target Stability DARTS assay for studying Rapamycin/mTOR interaction
Published on: August 27, 2019
10:21Mechanistic Insight into the Development of TNBS-Mediated Intestinal Fibrosis and Evaluating the Inhibitory Effects of Rapamycin
Published on: September 12, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Incorporating Hepatic Transporter-Mediated Clearance
A recent model describes pravastatin's hepatobiliary excretion,...
Pharmacokinetic Models: Overview
There are three primary types of models: empirical, compartment, and physiological. Empirical models, with minimal...
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Immunomodulatory Agents
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models
The distributed parameter models are specifically designed to account for variations and differences in some drug classes. This model is particularly useful for assessing regional concentrations of anticancer or...
Mechanistic Models: Overview of Compartment Models