Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2025

07:53
Group Synchronization During Collaborative Drawing Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
Published on: August 5, 2022
1.9K
A neurocognitive mechanism for increased cooperation during group formation
Wojciech Zajkowski1,2, Ryan P Badman3,4,5, Masahiko Haruno6
1Social Value Decision-Making Collaboration Unit, RIKEN Centre for Brain Science BTCC TOYOTA Collaboration Center, Wako, Saitama, 351-0198, Japan. wojciech.zajkowski@nih.gov.
Communications Psychology
|December 23, 2024
Summary
Group size increases cooperation by influencing memory and prosocial tendencies. Forgetting and individual preferences interact to drive cooperation in larger groups.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Social Psychology
- Behavioral Economics
Background:
- Cooperation is essential for social cohesion and group success.
- Understanding the dynamics of cooperation in varying group sizes is crucial.
- Previous research has not fully elucidated the cognitive and neural mechanisms underlying group size effects on cooperation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how changes in group size influence cooperative behavior.
- To identify the cognitive and neural underpinnings of cooperation modulation by group size.
- To explore the interplay between individual tendencies and strategic decision-making in dynamic group settings.
Main Methods:
- A dynamic, network-based prisoner's dilemma experiment was conducted with 83 participants.
- Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to capture neural activity during the experiment.
- Computational modeling was employed to analyze behavioral data and fMRI findings.
Main Results:
- Cooperation increased with larger group sizes.
- Group size itself did not directly increase cooperation; rather, it modulated the interaction between prosocial tendencies and reciprocal strategies.
- Memory confidence, influenced by forgetting and recall uncertainty, played a key role, shifting the balance towards prosociality in larger groups.
- Neural correlates of memory confidence (fusiform gyrus, precuneus) and its integration with prosocial tendencies (left DLPFC, dACC) were identified.
Conclusions:
- Emergent cooperation in dynamic groups is driven by the interaction between individual prosocial preferences and memory confidence during reciprocal interactions.
- Recall uncertainty, or forgetting, influences this interaction, favoring prosociality in larger groups.
- Neural mechanisms involving memory encoding and integration with social decision-making underpin these group size effects on cooperation.
Related Concept Videos
Social Loafing
34.6K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
34.6K
Robbers Cave
14.2K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.2K
Social Facilitation
31.8K
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
31.8K
Groupthink
44.1K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
44.1K
Social Proof
27.5K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.5K
In- and Out-Groups
38.8K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
38.8K

