Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2025

Tuning a Parallel Segmented Flow Column and Enabling Multiplexed Detection
Published on: December 15, 2015
In Situ Column Modification of Silica Monoliths With Pentafluorophenyl Ligands for the HPLC Separation of Eight
Georgijs Baškirovs1, Arianne Soliven2, Paweł Górnaś1
1Department of Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry, Institute of Horticulture, Dobele, Latvia.
Abstract:
Silica-based monoliths offer higher separation efficiency per unit pressure drop compared to particle-packed columns. Their application is limited by the commercial availability of different column chemistries. Pentafluorophenyl ligands enable hydrogen bonding, dipole-dipole, π-π, and hydrophobic interactions, facilitating the separation of various compounds. This study employs an in situ modification procedure, namely, the silylation reaction to bond these specific ligands to silica-based monoliths. Three chromolith silica monoliths were modified with three different PFP-moieties. The silica monolith was successfully modified in situ with 3-(pentafluorophenyl)propylmethyldichlorosilane and the separation behavior was compared to a particle-packed pentafluorophenyl column and a C18 monolith for the separation of tocochromanols (Vitamin E-related compounds). The C18 monolith failed to resolve all the tocochromanols, while the PFP particle-packed column and monolith were comparable under their optimized conditions. The PFP monoliths conditions are as follows: isocratic water-methanol (22:78, v/v) mobile phase, with a flow rate of 1.45 mL/min, at 15°C. Further chromatographic comparisons between the PFP particle-packed column to the PFP monolith included selectivity studies under isocratic conditions via the linear solvent strength model, which also showed comparable selectivity behavior. Differences in selectivity was demonstrated for a gradient separation of eight compounds to represent a relatively more complex separation. In addition, backpressure and Van Deemter comparisons were performed, and it was demonstrated that the main PFP monolith advantages were obtained near the pressure maximum of the PFP particle-packed column at 3.5 mL/min, comparable efficiencies were obtained, and the PFP monolith decreased the backpressure by one-third.
Related Concept Videos
Silica Gel Column Chromatography: Overview
Polar components tend to bind strongly to the silica gel, causing them to move slowly through the column. In contrast, nonpolar compounds...
High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: Introduction
In HPLC, two phases play a critical role in the separation process:
High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: Elution Process
Gas Chromatography: Types of Columns and Stationary Phases
For an analyte to remain on the column for a sufficient amount of time, it must exhibit some level of compatibility (or...
Principles Of Column Chromatography
Types Of Column Chromatography
Gel Filtration Chromatography
When the...

