Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Integration of Peer Navigators Into Longitudinal Research
Insights
Peer navigators significantly improved consent rates in the Outcomes of Babies With Opioid Exposure (OBOE) Study. This approach is recommended for high-risk populations to enhance research participation and data sharing.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Research
- Public Health
- Pediatrics
Background:
- Recruitment and consent are critical for longitudinal studies, especially those involving vulnerable populations.
- The Outcomes of Babies With Opioid Exposure (OBOE) Study investigates health outcomes in infants exposed to opioids.
- Low consent rates can hinder the progress and generalizability of research findings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of introducing peer navigators on consent rates within the OBOE Study.
- To identify changes in reasons for refusing consent after peer navigator implementation.
- To assess the effect of peer navigators on participants' willingness to share research information.
Main Methods:
- Secondary analysis of data from the multisite observational OBOE Study.
- Comparison of consent rates and refusal reasons before and after the introduction of peer navigators.
- Statistical analysis using chi-squared tests to determine significance (p < .05).
Main Results:
- Study consent rates significantly increased from 29% (852 participants) to 38% (403 participants) after peer navigator implementation (p = .001).
- The proportion of individuals unwilling to share information for research decreased from 41% to 26% (p = .005).
- Peer navigators were associated with improved engagement in research.
Conclusions:
- Peer navigators demonstrate a positive effect on increasing consent and willingness to share information in research studies.
- The findings support the integration of peer navigators in studies involving high-risk populations to improve recruitment.
- This strategy can enhance the feasibility and success of longitudinal research.
Objective:
To assess consent rates and reasons for refusing consent after the introduction of peer navigators into the Outcomes of Babies With Opioid Exposure (OBOE) Study.
Design:
Secondary analysis of data from the OBOE Study, a multisite observational study.
Setting:
Medical centers in Alabama, Ohio, and Pennsylvania (N = 4).
Participants:
Data about the use of peer navigators were obtained from the primary study, including 1,255 mothers or caregivers who were approached regarding participation in the study.
Methods:
We used χ2 tests to compare study consent rates and reasons for refusing consent before and after the use of peer navigators.
Results:
Following the addition of peer navigators, study consent rates significantly improved (29% of 852 before vs. 38% of 403 after; p = .001), and the percentage of potential participants who indicated that they were not interested in sharing information for research significantly decreased (41% of 247 vs. 26% of 115; p = .005).
Conclusion:
We demonstrate the potential effect of peer navigators on consent and interest in sharing information for research in a longitudinal research study. We recommend the inclusion of peer navigators in studies with high-risk populations.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Longitudinal Research
Longitudinal Studies
Cross-Sectional Research
Naturalistic Observations
Influence of Parents and Peers on Identity
Parental Influence on Identity Development
Parents serve as primary guides and managers in an adolescent's life, offering support instrumental in decision-making and personal growth....
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities

