Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2025
Homogeneous Time-resolved Förster Resonance Energy Transfer-based Assay for Detection of Insulin Secretion
Published on: May 10, 2018
Effects of synbiotics surpass probiotics alone in improving type 2 diabetes mellitus: A randomized, double-blind,
Chao Zhang1, Qi Zhang1, Xiaoxu Zhang1
1Department of Nutrition and Health, Key Laboratory of Functional Dairy, Co-constructed by Ministry of Education and Beijing Government, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Background And Aims:
Combining probiotics and prebiotics in synbiotics may present a synergistic approach to improve type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM); however, further evidence is required to establish the comparative efficacy of synbiotics versus probiotics. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis MN-Gup (MN-Gup) and a synbiotic mixture of MN-Gup and galactooligosaccharide (MN-Gup-GOS) on glycemic control in T2DM patients and explore possible mechanisms.
Methods:
This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial assigned 120 T2DM patients, to receive MN-Gup, MN-Gup-GOS, or placebo intervention for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was fasting blood glucose (FBG), with secondary outcomes including hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C), insulin, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), inflammatory indicators, oxidative stress indicators, gastrointestinal hormones, gut microbiota, and bile acids (BAs).
Results:
The median age of the 120 participants was 59 years (interquartile range: 55-62 years), with 40 being men. Compared to baseline, all three groups exhibited significant reductions in FBG. Additionally, the MN-Gup-GOS group demonstrated significant decreases in HbA1c, serum insulin, and HOMA-IR after intervention, whereas no such reductions were observed in the placebo and MN-Gup groups. Regarding the between-group comparisons, the MN-Gup-GOS intervention showed a significantly greater reduction in FBG compared to the placebo (least squares mean difference [95 % CI], -0.69 [-1.29, -0.10] mmol/L, P = 0.022) and MN-Gup (-0.59 [-1.17, -0.01], P = 0.047) group, but not for other indicators of glucose metabolism. Additionally, MN-Gup and MN-Gup-GOS intervention, especially the latter, significantly modified inflammation, oxidative stress, gut microbiota, serum BAs, and GLP-1 levels. Correlation analysis showed significant associations between changes in certain gut microbiota (Bifidobacterium) and BAs (deoxycholic acid and lithocholic acid) with glycemic indicators.
Conclusions:
The auxiliary effect of synbiotics MN-Gup-GOS on reducing FBG levels surpassed that of MN-Gup probiotics alone in T2DM patients, potentially attributed to the enhanced modulation of gut microbiota, BAs, and GLP-1 secretion.
Trial Registration:
This study was registered on the website of www.chictr.org.cn, number ChiCTR2100052187.
Related Concept Videos
01:22Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
01:15Diabetes: Management and Pharmacotherapy
Insulin remains the cornerstone of treatment for most patients with type 1 and many...
01:26Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Biguanides and Glitazones
01:36Carbohydrate Metabolism
Starch accounts for approximately 60% of the carbohydrates consumed by humans. Since amylase enzymes cannot function in the stomach's acidic environment, starch can only be digested in the mouth and small intestine. Simple sugars are found naturally in milk and fruits in...
01:17Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Sulfonylureas
01:22Diabetes Mellitus: Overview and Type I Subtype
Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease in which the immune system mistakenly attacks and destroys the insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreas. As a result, the body is unable to produce sufficient insulin, and individuals with...