Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

10.8K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
10.8K
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

12.6K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.6K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I01:30

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

132
The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
132
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

146
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
146
Cognitive Learning01:21

Cognitive Learning

91
Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
91
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.2K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Engineering 2,4-Diacetylphloroglucinol-Hyper-Tolerant <i>Escherichia coli</i> via Adaptive Evolution for Efficient Biosynthesis and an Organic Solvent-Free Downstream Process.

ACS synthetic biology·2026
Same author

Declines in organic matter persistence with increased soil carbon.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

A CD36-targeted aptamer-4-butyl-polyhydroxybenzophenone conjugate with pH-responsive release for liver delivery in MASLD.

Regenerative biomaterials·2026
Same author

Single-atom <i>versus</i> dual-atom catalysts on β<sub>12</sub>-borophene for reversible Li-CO<sub>2</sub> batteries: d-d orbital hybridization toward ultralow overpotential.

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP·2026
Same author

Capsular tension ring force line and intraocular lens angle on the impact of postoperative astigmatism in Marfan syndrome lens subluxation: a retrospective study.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

The acetylation mechanism and engineering strategy of isocitrate lyase for optimizing biosynthesis in <i>Escherichia coli</i>.

Synthetic and systems biotechnology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 8, 2025

A Protocol for Measuring Cue Reactivity in a Rat Model of Cocaine Use Disorder
07:51

A Protocol for Measuring Cue Reactivity in a Rat Model of Cocaine Use Disorder

Published on: June 18, 2018

10.5K

Effect of cue validity on the contextual cueing effect.

Wen Su1, Guang Zhao2, Jie Ma3

  • 1Public Courses Teaching Department, Guangzhou Sport University, Guangzhou, China.

Frontiers in Psychology
|December 25, 2024
PubMed
Summary

High cue validity (100% and 75%) enhances contextual cueing and visual search efficiency. Low cue validity (50%) impairs learning of context-target associations, hindering the contextual cueing effect.

Keywords:
contextcontextual cueing effectcue validitylearningvisual search

More Related Videos

Olfactory Context Dependent Memory: Direct Presentation of Odorants
04:47

Olfactory Context Dependent Memory: Direct Presentation of Odorants

Published on: September 18, 2018

6.5K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 8, 2025

A Protocol for Measuring Cue Reactivity in a Rat Model of Cocaine Use Disorder
07:51

A Protocol for Measuring Cue Reactivity in a Rat Model of Cocaine Use Disorder

Published on: June 18, 2018

10.5K
Olfactory Context Dependent Memory: Direct Presentation of Odorants
04:47

Olfactory Context Dependent Memory: Direct Presentation of Odorants

Published on: September 18, 2018

6.5K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.4K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Perception
  • Human Attention

Background:

  • The contextual cueing effect demonstrates how learning associations between contextual cues and targets improves visual search.
  • Real-world environments often present variable cue validity, challenging the consistency of learned associations.
  • Understanding how cue validity influences this learning process is crucial for explaining attention guidance in complex visual scenes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the critical role of cue validity in the contextual cueing effect.
  • To determine how different levels of cue validity impact the learning and expression of context-target associations.
  • To examine the influence of cue validity on implicit learning and visual search efficiency.

Main Methods:

  • Experiment 1: Manipulated cue validity at 100%, 75%, and 50% within a contextual cueing paradigm.
  • Experiment 2: Assessed the effect of imbalanced ratios of predictable versus unpredictable trials.
  • Experiment 3: Explored whether low cue validity impacts learning or expression of the contextual cueing effect.

Main Results:

  • Higher cue validity (100% and 75%) significantly enhanced the contextual cueing effect, leading to faster responses.
  • Lower cue validity (50%) failed to elicit the contextual cueing effect due to impaired learning of context-target associations.
  • The contextual cueing effect remained robust even with imbalanced trial ratios, and low cue validity primarily affected the initial learning phase.

Conclusions:

  • Cue validity is a significant factor in implicit learning from visual cues.
  • High cue validity facilitates stable context-target associations, promoting attention allocation and learning.
  • Low cue validity hinders the learning process, underscoring its importance in visual information processing.