Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The DNA Replication Fork01:02

The DNA Replication Fork

35.2K
An organism’s genome needs to be duplicated in an efficient and error-free manner for its growth and survival. The replication fork is a Y-shaped active region where two strands of DNA are separated and replicated continuously. The coupling of DNA unzipping and complementary strand synthesis is a characteristic feature of a replication fork.   Organisms with small circular DNA, such as E. coli, often have a single origin of replication; therefore, they have only two replication...
35.2K
Translesion DNA Polymerases02:10

Translesion DNA Polymerases

9.7K
Translesion (TLS) polymerases rescue stalled DNA polymerases at sites of damaged bases by replacing the replicative polymerase and installing a nucleotide across the damaged site. Doing so, TLS allows additional time for the cell to repair the damage before resuming regular DNA replication.
TLS polymerases are found in all three domains of life - archaea, bacteria, and eukaryotes. Of the different classes of TLS polymerases, members of the Y family are fitted with specialized structures that...
9.7K
Fixing Double-strand Breaks02:04

Fixing Double-strand Breaks

11.8K
The double-stranded structure of DNA has two major advantages. First, it serves as a safe repository of genetic information where one strand serves as the back-up in case the other strand is damaged. Second, the double-helical structure can be wrapped around proteins called histones to form nucleosomes, which can then be tightly wound to form chromosomes. This way, DNA chains up to 2 inches long can be contained within microscopic structures in a cell. A double-stranded break not only damages...
11.8K
DNA Damage can Stall the Cell Cycle02:37

DNA Damage can Stall the Cell Cycle

9.0K
In response to DNA damage, cells can pause the cell cycle to assess and repair the breaks. However, the cell must check the DNA at certain critical stages during the cell cycle. If the cell cycle pauses before DNA replication, the cells will contain twice the amount of DNA. On the other hand, if cells arrest after DNA replication but before mitosis, they will contain four times the normal amount of DNA. With a host of specialized proteins at their disposal,cells must use the right protein at...
9.0K
Homologous Recombination02:31

Homologous Recombination

49.7K
The basic reaction of homologous recombination (HR) involves two chromatids that contain DNA sequences sharing a significant stretch of identity. One of these sequences uses a strand from another as a template to synthesize DNA in an enzyme-catalyzed reaction. The final product is a novel amalgamation of the two substrates. To ensure an accurate recombination of sequences, HR is restricted to the S and G2 phases of the cell cycle. At these stages, the DNA has been replicated already and the...
49.7K
Restarting Stalled Replication Forks02:37

Restarting Stalled Replication Forks

5.7K
DNA replication is initiated at sites containing predefined DNA sequences known as origins of replication. DNA is unwound at these sites by the minichromosome maintenance (MCM) helicase and other factors such as Cdc45 and the associated GINS complex.The unwound single strands are protected by replication protein A (RPA) until DNA polymerase starts synthesizing DNA at the 5’ end of the strand in the same direction as the replication fork. To prevent the replication fork from falling apart,...
5.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Beta cell microRNAs function as molecular hubs of type 1 diabetes pathogenesis and as biomarkers of diabetes risk.

Diabetologia·2026
Same author

The Role of Transient Crosslinks in the Chromatin Search Response to DNA Damage.

International journal of molecular sciences·2025
Same author

Cell cycle dependent methylation of Dam1 contributes to kinetochore integrity and faithful chromosome segregation.

PLoS genetics·2025
Same author

A physics informed neural network approach to quantify antigen presentation activities at single cell level using omics data.

Research square·2025
Same author

TopoLoop: A new tool for chromatin loop detection in live cells via single-particle tracking.

The Journal of chemical physics·2024
Same author

RAD51 regulates eukaryotic chromatin motions in the absence of DNA damage.

Molecular biology of the cell·2024
Same journal

The nucleus as a mechanobiological hub in muscle aging.

Nucleus (Austin, Tex.)·2026
Same journal

Intrinsically disordered regions facilitate Mlp1-Nab2 recognition in mRNA quality control.

Nucleus (Austin, Tex.)·2026
Same journal

High-resolution nuclear cell biology by cryo-electron tomography.

Nucleus (Austin, Tex.)·2026
Same journal

Nuclei on the move: LINC complex-dependent and -independent mechanisms of nuclear migration in development.

Nucleus (Austin, Tex.)·2026
Same journal

Integration of nuclear mechanosensing with integrin-extracellular matrix adhesions.

Nucleus (Austin, Tex.)·2026
Same journal

Antagonistic contributions of A-type and B-type lamins to LBR localization and dynamics.

Nucleus (Austin, Tex.)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Examination of Proteins Bound to Nascent DNA in Mammalian Cells Using BrdU-ChIP-Slot-Western Technique
09:14

Examination of Proteins Bound to Nascent DNA in Mammalian Cells Using BrdU-ChIP-Slot-Western Technique

Published on: January 14, 2016

Closing the loops: chromatin loop dynamics after DNA damage.

Pierre-Alexandre Vidi1, Jing Liu2, Keith Bonin3

  • 1Laboratoire InGenO, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France.

Nucleus (Austin, Tex.)
|December 25, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Chromatin motion, a dynamic process, changes significantly after DNA damage. Pulsing loops and remodeling of chromatin tethers help separate damaged from undamaged DNA regions.

Keywords:
Chromatin coherenceDNA damagechromatin motionscohesinloopstethers

More Related Videos

Laser Microirradiation to Study In Vivo Cellular Responses to Simple and Complex DNA Damage
10:44

Laser Microirradiation to Study In Vivo Cellular Responses to Simple and Complex DNA Damage

Published on: January 31, 2018

Visualization of DNA Repair Proteins Interaction by Immunofluorescence
07:55

Visualization of DNA Repair Proteins Interaction by Immunofluorescence

Published on: June 26, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Examination of Proteins Bound to Nascent DNA in Mammalian Cells Using BrdU-ChIP-Slot-Western Technique
09:14

Examination of Proteins Bound to Nascent DNA in Mammalian Cells Using BrdU-ChIP-Slot-Western Technique

Published on: January 14, 2016

Laser Microirradiation to Study In Vivo Cellular Responses to Simple and Complex DNA Damage
10:44

Laser Microirradiation to Study In Vivo Cellular Responses to Simple and Complex DNA Damage

Published on: January 31, 2018

Visualization of DNA Repair Proteins Interaction by Immunofluorescence
07:55

Visualization of DNA Repair Proteins Interaction by Immunofluorescence

Published on: June 26, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics
  • Biophysics

Background:

  • Chromatin, the complex of DNA and proteins, exists as a dynamic polymer.
  • Chromatin motion is heterogeneous within cell nuclei and varies between cells.
  • Genomic insults like DNA damage profoundly alter chromatin dynamics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the role of chromatin tethering and loop formation in chromatin dynamics.
  • To emphasize the contribution of pulsing loops to chromatin motion.
  • To propose a model for how chromatin tether remodeling affects damaged and undamaged regions.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on chromatin dynamics and DNA damage response.
  • Analysis of polymer models predicting chromatin coherence.
  • Experimental data interpretation regarding chromatin motion scales.

Main Results:

  • Chromatin motions are heterogeneous and scale-dependent, especially after DNA damage.
  • Pulsing loops are identified as key contributors to chromatin motion.
  • Chromatin tethers are proposed to mediate micron-scale coherence.

Conclusions:

  • Remodeling of chromatin tethers in response to DNA breaks allows for the uncoupling of damaged and undamaged chromatin regions.
  • Understanding chromatin dynamics is crucial for comprehending DNA repair mechanisms.
  • Chromatin tether remodeling offers a novel perspective on genome organization post-damage.