Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026
FISH for Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis
Published on: February 23, 2011
Pretransplant Chromosome Genomic Array Testing Improves Prognostication for Myelofibrosis Patients Undergoing
Xiaoyu Qu1, Emily Stevens2, Matthew P Fitzgibbon1
1Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington.
Background:
Despite its known superior diagnostic yield for chromosomal anomalies compared with karyotype and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) studies, chromosome genomic array testing (CGAT) is not used as a routine clinical test for myelofibrosis. Although many prognostic systems exist that risk stratify patients at diagnosis, limited tools are available to prognosticate transplant outcome.
Objective:
The current study aimed at testing whether CGAT results obtained before transplantation improves prognosis of post-transplant outcome in patients with myelofibrosis compared with current risk categorization systems, for example, DIPSS plus (Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System).
Study Design:
We studied patients with myelofibrosis who underwent hematopoietic cell transplantation between 2000 and 2017 at our center (N = 44). We assessed the prognostic significance of CGAT, DIPSS plus, and the total count of gene mutations for post-transplant clinical outcomes, including relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD).
Results:
Abnormal CGAT results were seen in 24 patients (55%), including 18 with copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity (cnLOH, 41%). With a median follow-up of 91 (range 2-258) months starting from the CGAT sample date, RFS was 59% and OS was 68%. The outcome analysis showed significant prognostic implication from CGAT (normal vs. abnormal), specifically for patients with intermediate risk by DIPSS-plus scores and those with 0∼2 mutations. CGAT alone significantly stratified the patients' RFS outcome (P = .03). The addition of CGAT to DIPSS-plus improved the significance from a P value of .08 to .003, whereas the addition of CGAT to mutation count improved the P value from .02 to .01. The best stratification system for RFS was achieved when CGAT, DIPSS-plus, and mutation count were all considered (P = 1e-08). The current study also confirmed individual anomalies that are prognostically significant, including U2AF1 mutation (n = 5, P = .03) and 1q gain (n = 3, P = .01), which were associated with worse RFS. ASXL1 mutations (n = 14) appeared to associate with a later onset of chronic GVHD (P =.03).
Conclusion:
Pretransplant CGAT analysis augments the existing risk stratification tools and may be considered as routine clinical testing for myelofibrosis.
