Early safety after TAVR according to VARC-3 criteria: incidence, predictors, and clinical impact
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2026

Standardized Technique of Aortic Valve Re-implantation for Valve-sparing Aortic Root Replacement
Published on: December 11, 2017
Ariana Gonzálvez-García1, Pedro Cepas-Guillén2, Julien Ternacle3
1Department of Cardiology, Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada; Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
Introduction And Objectives:
The Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-3 definition of the early safety (ES) composite endpoint after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) lacks clinical validation. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence, predictors, and clinical impact of ES after TAVR as defined by VARC-3 criteria.
Methods:
We performed a multicenter study including 10 078 patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transarterial TAVR. According to VARC-3 criteria, ES at 30 days was defined as freedom from all-cause mortality, stroke, VARC type 2-4 bleeding, major vascular, access-related, or cardiac structural complications, acute kidney injury stages 3-4, moderate or severe aortic regurgitation, new permanent pacemaker implantation, and surgery or intervention related to the device. Baseline, procedural, and follow-up data were prospectively collected in a dedicated database.
Results:
ES was achieved in 6598 patients (65.5%). The main factors associated with a lack of ES were the occurrence of type 2-4 bleeding (18.9%), and new pacemaker implantation (13.6%). Advanced age, peripheral artery disease, chronic kidney disease, and balloon postdilation were associated with an increased risk of no-ES (P<.01 for all). Failure to achieve ES was associated with higher all-cause mortality up to 1-year after TAVR (HR, 3.17; 95%CI, 2.76-3.65; P<.001).
Conclusions:
VARC-3 ES was not achieved in up to one-third of contemporary TAVR patients, which was associated with worse mid-term outcomes. The factors associated with increased risk were advanced age, baseline comorbidities, and some procedural features (postdilation). These findings highlight the importance of continued efforts to minimize the risk of TAVR-related procedural complications.
More Related Videos
08:50Technique and Patient Selection Criteria of Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy for Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement
Published on: March 26, 2018
06:59Improved Registration of 3D CT Angiography with X-ray Fluoroscopy for Image Fusion During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Published on: June 3, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol abuse, or...
Relative Risk
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care