Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2025
Author Spotlight: Scope of LE-ULBD as a Safe, Effective, and Minimally Invasive Approach to Treat Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Published on: February 9, 2024
Adjacent Level Canal Area Changes up to Two Years After Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Decompressive Surgery
Helena Brisby1,2, Tor Åge Myklebust3,4, Hasan Banitalebi5,6
1Spine Surgery Team, Department of Orthopedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenborg, Sweden.
Study Design:
A secondary analysis of data from the NORDSTEN-spinal stenosis trial (SST).
Objective:
The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the dural sac cross-sectional area (DSCA) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of adjacent segments decreases after decompressive surgery due to lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) up to 2 years postoperatively and to investigate possible associations with baseline variables, including preoperative patient and radiological characteristics, and surgical method used.
Summary Of Background Data:
Decompressive surgery for LSS is currently the most common spinal surgery procedure; however, there is limited knowledge of changes in the DSCA over time adjacent to a decompressed segment.
Materials And Methods:
In the NORDSTEN-SST, 437 patients were randomized to decompression with one of three minimally invasive surgical methods for LSS. The patients underwent an MRI of the lumbar spine (L2-L5) before surgery and at 3 and 24 months postoperatively. Descriptive statistics of adjacent DSCA and changes in adjacent DSCA are presented. Possible prognostic factors (preoperative factors, radiologic measures, and surgical method) for changes in the adjacent DSCA were examined using multivariate regression analyses.
Results:
Three hundred twenty-two patients (74%) in the original NORDSTEN-SST had undergone MRI at both 3 and 24 months postoperatively and were included (360 adjacent levels, 263 cranial, and 97 caudal to a decompressed level). Up to two years postoperatively, no decrease in adjacent DSCA was observed. No associations were found between the investigated baseline variables and DSCA change from zero to two years, except for a weak association with baseline adjacent DSCA.
Conclusions:
Up to two years postoperatively, the DSCA did not decrease at adjacent levels after decompressive surgery. None of the investigated baseline variables showed any clinically meaningful prognostic value regarding adjacent DSCA changes two years postoperatively. The findings support previous reports that decompression of adjacent levels is not required to prevent subsequent stenosis.
