Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes01:25

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes

433
Consider a component AB undergoing a linear motion. Along with a linear motion, point B also rotates around point A. To comprehend this complex movement, position vectors for both points A and B are established using a stationary reference frame.
However, to express the relative position of point B relative to point A, an additional frame of reference, denoted as x'y', is necessary. This additional frame not only translates but also rotates relative to the fixed frame, making it...
433
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes - Acceleration01:22

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes - Acceleration

309
Consider a component AB undergoing a linear motion. Along with a linear motion, point B also rotates around point A. To comprehend this complex movement, position vectors for both points A and B are established using a stationary reference frame. The absolute velocity of point B is determined by adding the absolute velocity of point A, the relative velocity of point B in the rotating frame, and the effects caused by the angular velocity within the rotating frame.
Time differentiation is...
309
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving01:29

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving

369
Consider a crane whose telescopic boom rotates with an angular velocity of 0.04 rad/s and angular acceleration of 0.02 rad/s2. Along with the rotation, the boom also extends linearly with a uniform speed of 5 m/s. The extension of the boom is measured at point D, which is measured with respect to the fixed point C on the other end of the boom. For the given instant, the distance between points C and D is 60 meters.
Here, in order to determine the magnitude of velocity and acceleration for point...
369
Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration01:10

Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration

312
A slider-crank mechanism converts rotational motion from the crank into linear motion of the slider or vice versa. This mechanism consists of three main parts: the crank, the connecting rod, and the slider. The movement of the slider-crank is an example of general plane motion as the fluctuating angle between the crank and the connecting rod. Consider a segment AB where point A is at the end of the slider and point B is on the diametrically opposite end to point A, on a crack. The variance in...
312
Kinematic Equations for Rotation01:30

Kinematic Equations for Rotation

292
In mechanics, when one observes a rigid body in rotational motion with constant angular acceleration, it is possible to establish equations for its rotational kinematics. This process resembles how linear kinematics are dealt with in simpler motion studies.
For instance, imagine a point A on a rigid body engaged in circular motion. The translational velocity of this particular point can be calculated by taking the time derivatives of the displacement equation, which essentially measures the...
292
Kinematic Equations: Problem Solving01:15

Kinematic Equations: Problem Solving

11.7K
When analyzing one-dimensional motion with constant acceleration, the problem-solving strategy involves identifying the known quantities and choosing the appropriate kinematic equations to solve for the unknowns. Either one or two kinematic equations are needed to solve for the unknowns, depending on the known and unknown quantities. Generally, the number of equations required is the same as the number of unknown quantities in the given example. Two-body pursuit problems always require two...
11.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for uridine-5'-diphosphate N-acetylglucosamine production through salvage pathway.

Metabolic engineering·2026
Same author

Toward a Fully Automated NIOSH Lifting Equation Using Computer Vision.

Human factors·2026
Same author

Exploring the integration of large language models in human-robot collaboration: Effects on performance, mental stress, and trust.

Applied ergonomics·2026
Same author

Enhancing Data Privacy in Human Factors Studies with Federated Learning.

Human factors·2025
Same author

Effects of anthropomorphic features of co-robots on users' perception and emotional responses during human-robot collaboration.

Ergonomics·2025
Same author

Artificial Cascade Transformation Biosystem for One-Pot Biomanufacturing of Odd-Numbered Neoagarooligosaccharides and d-Tagatose through Wiser Agarose Utilization.

Journal of agricultural and food chemistry·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 8, 2025

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation
12:33

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation

Published on: December 31, 2013

8.8K

Video-Based Lifting Action Recognition Using Rank-Altered Kinematic Feature Pairs.

SeHee Jung1, Bingyi Su1, Lu Lu1

  • 1North Carolina State University, USA.

Human Factors
|December 26, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a computer vision method for real-time lifting action recognition and counting. The efficient approach uses kinematic features for reliable monitoring, aiding in preventing work-related injuries.

Keywords:
computer visionlifting countingmusculoskeletal disordertop scoring pairworkplace safety

More Related Videos

Combining Eye-tracking Data with an Analysis of Video Content from Free-viewing a Video of a Walk in an Urban Park Environment
08:25

Combining Eye-tracking Data with an Analysis of Video Content from Free-viewing a Video of a Walk in an Urban Park Environment

Published on: May 7, 2019

8.9K
Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans
10:51

Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans

Published on: January 15, 2018

8.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 8, 2025

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation
12:33

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation

Published on: December 31, 2013

8.8K
Combining Eye-tracking Data with an Analysis of Video Content from Free-viewing a Video of a Walk in an Urban Park Environment
08:25

Combining Eye-tracking Data with an Analysis of Video Content from Free-viewing a Video of a Walk in an Urban Park Environment

Published on: May 7, 2019

8.9K
Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans
10:51

Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans

Published on: January 15, 2018

8.3K

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Computer Vision
  • Ergonomics

Background:

  • Traditional lifting action recognition relies on wearable sensors and deep learning, which can be resource-intensive.
  • Implementing these methods on limited hardware poses significant challenges for real-time monitoring.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a streamlined, computer vision-based method for identifying and counting lifting actions in videos.
  • To enable reliable real-time monitoring of lifting tasks for injury prevention.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized BlazePose for real-time human keypoint detection.
  • Extracted and preprocessed kinematic features from detected keypoints.
  • Employed rank-altered kinematic feature pairs for lifting/non-lifting classification.
  • Developed a lifting counting algorithm based on the classification predictions.

Main Results:

  • An ensemble classifier using nine key rank-altered kinematic feature pairs achieved over 0.89 in accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score.
  • The lifting counting accuracy reached 0.90 with a minimal latency of 0.06 ms.
  • The proposed method demonstrated at least 12.5 times faster performance compared to baseline classifiers.

Conclusions:

  • Computer vision-based kinematic features offer an effective and efficient solution for recognizing lifting actions.
  • The developed method is suitable for deployment on resource-constrained platforms like mobile and embedded systems.
  • Real-time monitoring of lifting tasks can proactively prevent work-related low-back injuries.