Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2025

A Personalized 3D-Printed Model for Preoperative Evaluation in Thyroid Surgery
Published on: February 17, 2023
Application value of personalized 3D printing vaginal model for the Image-guided adaptive brachytherapy of cervical
Zhantuo Cai1, Qiuyan Wu1, Xinglong Yang1
1The 3th Ward of Radiotherapy Department, Guangzhou Institute of Cancer Research, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Objective:
To explore the application value of using 3-dimensional (3D) printing (3DP) technology to create individualized vaginal molds for brachytherapy (BT) in high-dose-rate 3D cervical cancer through reverse engineering of needle placement.
Methods:
Prospectively, 11 patients with cervical cancer were treated with 3DP-intracavitary/interstitial (IC/IS) BT using 3DP to create individualized vaginal molds. All patients were performed BT after completion of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Each patient was treated with BT 5 times, the prescription dose was 600 cGy/F, which was performed once or twice a week, 2 of them were freehand IC/IS BT, and 3 were 3DP-IC/IS BT. The relevant planning parameters (bladder, rectum, sigmoid colon, and small intestine) and target conformity index (CI) for high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) and organs at risk (OARs) were compared between the groups.
Results:
There were significant advantages in the 3DP-IC/IS BT group compared with the freehand IC/IS BT group: HR-CTV D90 (629.40±19.34 vs. 613.03±15.93 cGy, p=0.002), D95 (580.74±18.31 vs. 567.44±23.94 cGy, p=0.032), bladder D2cc (431.11±23.27 vs. 458.07±23.27 cGy, p<0.001), bladder D1cc and bladder D0.1cc. There was no statistically significant difference (p>0.05) between the 2 groups in rectal D2cc (352.30±42.42 vs. 361.29±42.42 cGy, p=0.470), sigmoid colon D2cc (236.73±78.95 vs. 246.50±58.17 cGy, p=0.621), CI (0.79±0.04 vs. 0.79±0.039 p=0.773), HR-CTV V100, V200, D98, D100 and other OARs parameters (p>0.05).
Conclusion:
Compared with IC/IS BT, 3DP-IC/IS BT has apparent advantages with simple operation and high safety. In addition, individualized mold helps to improve the tumor target area's radiation dose while meeting the dose-limiting requirements for organs at risk and reduces the clinical proficiency requirements for operating physicians.

