Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2025
Author Spotlight: Advancing the Study of Brain-Heart Interplay with a Comprehensive EEGLAB Plugin for Multimodal Signal Analysis
Published on: April 26, 2024
Continuous Estimation of Blood Pressure by Utilizing Seismocardiogram Signal Features in Relation to
Aleksandra Zienkiewicz1, Vesa Korhonen2,3, Vesa Kiviniemi2,3
1Optoelectronics and Measurement Techniques Research Unit, University of Oulu, 90570 Oulu, Finland.
Abstract:
There is an ongoing search for a reliable and continuous method of noninvasive blood pressure (BP) tracking. In this study, we investigate the feasibility of utilizing seismocardiogram (SCG) signals, i.e., chest motion caused by cardiac activity, for this purpose. This research is novel in examining the temporal relationship between the SCG-measured isovolumic moment and the electrocardiogram (PEPIM). Additionally, we compare these results with the traditionally measured pre-ejection period with the aortic opening marked as an endpoint (PEPAO). The accuracy of the BP estimation was evaluated beat to beat against invasively measured arterial BP. Data were collected on separate days as eighteen sets from nine subjects undergoing a medical procedure with anesthesia. Results for PEPIM showed a correlation of 0.67 ± 0.18 (p < 0.001), 0.66 ± 0.17 (p < 0.001), and 0.67 ± 0.17 (p < 0.001) when compared to systolic BP, diastolic BP, and mean arterial pressure (MAP), respectively. Corresponding results for PEPAO were equal to 0.61 ± 0.22 (p < 0.001), 0.61 ± 0.21 (p < 0.001), and 0.62 ± 0.22 (p < 0.001). Values of PEPIM were used to estimate MAP using two first-degree models, the linear regression model (achieved RMSE of 11.7 ± 4.0 mmHg) and extended model with HR (RMSE of 10.8 ± 4.2 mmHg), and two corresponding second-degree models (RMSE of 10.8 ± 3.7 mmHg and RMSE of 8.5 ± 3.4 mmHg for second-degree polynomial and second-degree extended, respectively). In the intrasubject testing of the second-degree model extended with HR based on PEPIM values, the mean error of MAP estimation in three follow-up measurements was in the range of 7.5 to 10.5 mmHg, without recalibration. This study demonstrates the method's potential for further research, particularly given that both proximal and distal pulses are measured in close proximity to the heart and cardiac output. This positioning may enhance the method's capacity to more accurately reflect central blood pressure compared to peripheral measurements.
More Related Videos
11:50High-frequency High-resolution Echocardiography: First Evidence on Non-invasive Repeated Measure of Myocardial Strain, Contractility, and Mitral Regurgitation in the Ischemia-reperfused Murine Heart
Published on: July 9, 2010
10:53Ultrasonic Assessment of Myocardial Microstructure
Published on: January 14, 2014
Related Concept Videos
01:29Electrocardiogram
Three major waveforms are present in a typical ECG recording: the P wave, the QRS complex, and...
01:30Equipments Used To Measure Blood Pressure
This invasive approach involves cannulating a peripheral artery. During each cardiac contraction, pressure generates mechanical motion within the catheter, transmitted through rigid, fluid-filled tubing to a transducer. This transducer converts mechanical motion into electrical signals displayed as waveforms on a monitor. An automatic flushing system prevents blood backflow. Due to the potential risk of unexpected arterial blood loss, this method is primarily used in intensive...
01:30Pulse rhythm
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac...
01:28Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
01:23Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
01:15Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(one-step method)
Prepare for the Procedure: