Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Improved Loss Function for Mass Segmentation in Mammography Images Using Density and Mass Size.

Journal of imaging·2024
Same journal

Human-AI Interaction in Interventional Radiology: A Narrative Review of Current Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions.

Journal of imaging·2026
Same journal

Coronary Artery Anomalies and Anatomical Variants: Cross-Sectional Diagnostic Imaging and Clinical Background.

Journal of imaging·2026
Same journal

YoLeTooth: A Unified Framework for Joint Tooth Segmentation and Periapical Lesion Detection in Panoramic Radiographs.

Journal of imaging·2026
Same journal

Radiomics-Guided Multi-Sequence Learning for Pathological Complete Response Prediction from Breast MRI with Missing Auxiliary Sequences.

Journal of imaging·2026
Same journal

Cutaneous Thermography in Arthropathies: Quantitative Imaging, Machine Learning, and Clinical Translation.

Journal of imaging·2026
Same journal

Two-Stage Dynamic Synergistic Segmentation Method for Myocardial Pathology.

Journal of imaging·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 4, 2025

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

42.8K

Towards Robust Supervised Pectoral Muscle Segmentation in Mammography Images.

Parvaneh Aliniya1, Mircea Nicolescu1, Monica Nicolescu1

  • 1Computer Science and Engineering Department, College of Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, Main Campus, Reno, NV 89557, USA.

Journal of Imaging
|December 27, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces pectoral muscle segmentation masks for mammography datasets, enabling deep learning for automated breast cancer detection. Cross-dataset testing shows comparable performance to same-dataset training.

Keywords:
CBIS-DDSMINbreastMIASbreast cancer mammographydeep learningpectoral musclesupervised training

More Related Videos

Segmentation and Linear Measurement for Body Composition Analysis using Slice-O-Matic and Horos
13:35

Segmentation and Linear Measurement for Body Composition Analysis using Slice-O-Matic and Horos

Published on: March 21, 2021

10.4K
Swin-PSAxialNet: An Efficient Multi-Organ Segmentation Technique
04:48

Swin-PSAxialNet: An Efficient Multi-Organ Segmentation Technique

Published on: July 5, 2024

367

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 4, 2025

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

42.8K
Segmentation and Linear Measurement for Body Composition Analysis using Slice-O-Matic and Horos
13:35

Segmentation and Linear Measurement for Body Composition Analysis using Slice-O-Matic and Horos

Published on: March 21, 2021

10.4K
Swin-PSAxialNet: An Efficient Multi-Organ Segmentation Technique
04:48

Swin-PSAxialNet: An Efficient Multi-Organ Segmentation Technique

Published on: July 5, 2024

367

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Computer-Aided Diagnosis
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Mammography is crucial for breast cancer screening, but pectoral muscle presence complicates automated detection.
  • Existing pectoral muscle removal methods often rely on traditional machine learning due to a lack of segmentation data.
  • Developing robust automated detection systems requires effective pectoral muscle segmentation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide pectoral muscle segmentation masks for the INbreast, MIAS, and CBIS-DDSM datasets.
  • To facilitate the development of supervised deep learning methods for pectoral muscle removal.
  • To evaluate the efficacy of deep learning models trained with segmentation masks for pectoral muscle segmentation.

Main Methods:

  • Generated pectoral muscle segmentation masks for INbreast, MIAS, and CBIS-DDSM datasets.
  • Trained an AU-Net model for pectoral muscle segmentation on INbreast and CBIS-DDSM datasets.
  • Evaluated model performance using cross-dataset testing on unseen data, including the MIAS dataset.

Main Results:

  • Pectoral muscle segmentation masks were successfully created for multiple public datasets.
  • Deep learning models (AU-Net) demonstrated effectiveness in pectoral muscle segmentation.
  • Cross-dataset testing yielded performance comparable to same-dataset experiments, validating generalizability.

Conclusions:

  • The provided segmentation masks enable advanced deep learning approaches for pectoral muscle removal in mammography.
  • Deep learning models trained with these masks offer a powerful tool for automated breast cancer detection systems.
  • Cross-dataset evaluation confirms the robustness and applicability of the developed methods to unseen data.