Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Developing a Charlson Comorbidity Index for the American Indian Population Using the Epidemiologic Data from the
Paul Rogers1, Christine Merenda2, Richardae Araojo2
1National Center for Toxicological Research, Division of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, AR, USA. Paul.Rogers@fda.hhs.gov.
Insights
This study adapted the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) for American Indians, creating a modified CCI (mCCI-AI). The mCCI-AI accurately predicts 1-year mortality risk in this population.
Area of Science:
- Epidemiology
- Biostatistics
- Public Health
Background:
- The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) is a widely used mortality prediction tool.
- The CCI may not accurately represent mortality risk for American Indians due to population-specific health burdens and potential underrepresentation in original cohorts.
- American Indians face a higher prevalence of comorbidities like diabetes, obesity, cancer, and cardiovascular disease.
Purpose of the Study:
- To modify and validate the CCI for improved mortality risk prediction among American Indians.
- To develop a culturally relevant comorbidity index for a specific population.
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from The Strong Heart Study (SHS), a longitudinal study of American Indian cardiovascular disease.
- Performed 1-year survival analysis using SHS morbidity and mortality data.
- Assessed comorbidity impact via hazard ratios and employed Kaplan-Meier plots for validation.
Main Results:
- Modified CCI for American Indians (mCCI-AI) demonstrated significant predictor capabilities.
- Weights for myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, and high blood pressure were higher in the mCCI-AI compared to the original CCI.
- Lung cancer exhibited the highest weight (hazard ratio 8.31), and liver illness weight was equivalent to the severe form in the original CCI.
Conclusions:
- The mCCI-AI is a statistically significant predictor of 1-year mortality in American Indians.
- The mCCI-AI effectively stratified patients into different risk categories.
- The developed index achieved 73% accuracy in discriminating between survivors and non-survivors.
Background:
The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) is a frequently used mortality predictor based on a scoring system for the number and type of patient comorbidities health researchers have used since the late 1980s. The initial purpose of the CCI was to classify comorbid conditions, which could alter the risk of patient mortality within a 1-year time frame. However, the CCI may not accurately reflect risk among American Indians because they are a small proportion of the US population and possibly lack representation in the original patient cohort. A motivating factor in calibrating a CCI for American Indians is that this population, as a whole, experiences a greater burden of comorbidities, including diabetes mellitus, obesity, cancer, cardiovascular disease, and other chronic health conditions, than the rest of the US population.
Methods:
This study attempted to modify the CCI to be specific to the American Indian population utilizing the data from the still ongoing The Strong Heart Study (SHS) - a multi-center population-based longitudinal study of cardiovascular disease among American Indians. A 1-year survival analysis with mortality as the outcome was performed using the SHS morbidity and mortality surveillance data and assessing the impact of comorbidities in terms of hazard ratios with the training cohort. A Kaplan-Meier plot for a subset of the testing cohort was used to compare groups with selected mCCI-AI scores.
Results:
A total of 3038 Phase VI participants from the SHS comprised the study population for whom mortality and morbidity surveillance data were available through December 2019. The weights generated by the SHS participants for myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, and high blood pressure were greater than Charlson's original weights. In addition, the weights for liver illness were equivalent to Charlson's severe form of the disease. Lung cancer had the greatest overall weight derived from a hazard ratio of 8.31.
Conclusions:
The mCCI-AI was a statistically significant predictor of 1-year mortality, classifying patients into different risk strata χ2 (8, N = 1,245) = 30.56 (p = 0.0002). The mCCI-AI was able to discriminate between participants who died and those who survived 73% of the time.
More Related Videos
13:07Optical Coherence Tomography Based Biomechanical Fluid-Structure Interaction Analysis of Coronary Atherosclerosis Progression
Published on: January 15, 2022
07:31Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-IV: Assessement and Diagnostic Studies
Medical History
Factors Affecting Illness
For instance, risk factors are connected to illness,...
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Prevalence and Incidence
Prevalence indicates the proportion of individuals in a population who have a specific disease or health...