Prediction of cerebral palsy and cognitive delay among high-risk children in a developing nation: A successful early

Gemunu Hewawitharana1,2, Nuwan Darshana Ila3, Asha Madhushani Ui1

  • 1Paediatric Neurology Unit, Teaching Hospital, Galle, Sri Lanka.

Insights

Combining General Movements Assessment (GMA) and Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination (HINE) effectively predicts developmental delays in infants. This combined approach improves early detection of cerebral palsy and other developmental issues in low-resource settings.

Area of Science:

  • Developmental Pediatrics
  • Neurology
  • Global Health

Background:

  • Early detection of developmental impairments in infants is crucial for timely intervention, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).
  • Standard follow-up schedules often lack comprehensive tools for predicting diverse developmental outcomes.
  • The General Movements Assessment (GMA) and Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination (HINE) are established tools, but their combined feasibility and predictive power in LMICs require investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the feasibility of integrating the GMA and HINE into routine infant follow-up in LMICs.
  • To evaluate the combined predictive accuracy of GMA and HINE for cerebral palsy (CP) and non-CP-related developmental delays.
  • To determine the optimal combination of assessments for early identification of developmental risks.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective study of 201 infants in Sri Lanka (LMIC).
  • Infants underwent GMA (writhing and fidgeting movements) before 44 weeks and at 3-4 months, followed by HINE at 5-6 months.
  • Developmental outcomes assessed using Bayley Scales (4th Ed.) and clinical evaluation after 24 months.

Main Results:

  • Combined GMA and HINE achieved 100% sensitivity for predicting CP, significantly higher than individual assessments.
  • The combined approach demonstrated superior sensitivity (>83%) for predicting non-CP-related motor, cognitive, and social-emotional delays compared to single assessments (<65%).
  • Specificity for predicting both CP and non-CP delays was moderate (<46%).

Conclusions:

  • Combining two GMA assessments with the HINE is a feasible and highly sensitive method for identifying infants with CP and non-CP developmental delays in LMICs.
  • This integrated assessment strategy enables targeted early intervention in settings with limited specialist resources.
  • The findings support the use of GMA and HINE in routine follow-up for improved developmental surveillance in at-risk infants.
Abstract