Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2025

Removal of Arsenic Using a Cationic Polymer Gel Impregnated with Iron Hydroxide
Published on: June 28, 2019
Co-occurrence of arsenic and sewage pollutants in surface and groundwater and its implications for water treatment
Débora Campos Barreira de Aguilar1, Marina Muniz de Queiroz1, Carolina Cristiane Pinto2
1Department of Sanitation and Environmental Engineering, School of Engineering, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Avenue Antônio Carlos, 6627, Campus Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Abstract:
Arsenic (As) enrichment in groundwater stems from natural and hydrogeochemical factors, leading to geological contamination. Groundwater and surface water are interconnected, allowing As migration and surface water contamination. The As contamination poses health risks through contaminated water consumption. Sewage discharge in rich-As water bodies alters environmental conditions, increasing the concentration of organic matter, carbonate and bicarbonate, nitrite, sulfate, and phosphate in water. These changes could enhance As solubilization and release to water. This review investigates the interactions between these contaminants, and their implications for membrane-based water treatment processes. Organic pollutants in surface water promote microbial growth, depleting oxygen and altering redox conditions, which enhances As solubilization and concentration in the water. The interaction between organic pollutants and As primarily occurs through adsorption and complexation, influenced by the pollutants' functional groups and the water's pH. Bicarbonates and pH play critical roles in determining As speciation (As(V) or As(III)), while oxidants like nitrate increase As mobility by promoting its oxidation. When arsenic is primarily present as As(V), membrane-based removal processes tend to be more efficient. Sulfur also affects As dynamics through microbial processes and adsorption onto sulfide minerals. When nitrate and sulfate are present, Donnan exclusion becomes a critical mechanism that affects arsenic removal by NF and RO membranes. Although membrane technologies maintain high As rejection rates (97-99 %), even in the presence of sewage pollutants, this advantage is offset by the challenges of fouling and the generation of highly concentrated waste streams. So, it is urgent to avoid raw or not adequately treated sewage in As-rich environments.
More Related Videos
09:23Removal of Trace Elements by Cupric Oxide Nanoparticles from Uranium In Situ Recovery Bleed Water and Its Effect on Cell Viability
Published on: June 21, 2015
10:05Integrated Field Lysimetry and Porewater Sampling for Evaluation of Chemical Mobility in Soils and Established Vegetation
Published on: July 4, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Precipitation and Co-precipitation
Environmental Applications of Microorganisms