Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2025

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
Published on: October 23, 2020
Long-term survival and risk factors in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A Kaplan-Meier and cox regression study
Zheng-Ting Ren1, Mei Kang1, Li-Yang Zhu1
1Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230022, Anhui Province, China.
Background:
The global incidence of esophageal cancer (EC) remains high. Despite advancements in medical technology and deeper research into the causes and treatment methods of EC, the effectiveness of treatment for EC is still unsatisfactory. Therefore, it is crucial to address the urgent problem of improving the long-term survival rate of EC patients and providing personalized treatment.
Aim:
To analyze the survival prognosis and influencing factors of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).
Methods:
A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 115 patients with pT3N0M0 ESCC who underwent radical surgery alone from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2019. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates and median survival time of the patients. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to assess the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) of risk factors.
Results:
The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates for the 115 EC patients analyzed were 85.22%, 50.43%, and 37.48%, respectively. The median OS was 37.00 (95%CI: 24.93-49.07) months, and the median disease-free survival was 21.00 (95%CI: 14.71-27.29) months. Both univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed that high body mass index (BMI; HR = 1.137, 95%CI: 1.054-1.226), positive perineural invasion (PNI; HR = 13.381, 95%CI: 4.899-36.547), and smoking (HR = 2.415, 95%CI: 1.388-4.203) were independent risk factors for a poor prognosis. In contrast, compared to the upper thoracic location of the tumor, middle thoracic (HR = 0.441, 95%CI: 0.240-0.810) and lower thoracic (HR = 0.328, 95%CI: 0.144-0.750) locations were protective factors.
Conclusion:
BMI, tumor location, PNI, and smoking are associated with the prognosis of ESCC patients. This study highlights the prognostic risk factors for T3N0M0 ESCC patients and offers personalized insights for clinical treatment.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Introduction To Survival Analysis
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time...
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Barrett Esophagus-I: Introduction
This constant acid exposure transforms the esophagus's pink mucosal lining (stratified squamous epithelium) into a type of lining more...

