Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2026

Serum and Plasma Copy Number Detection Using Real-time PCR
Published on: December 15, 2017
Phase 3 Study of Talazoparib Plus Enzalutamide Versus Placebo Plus Enzalutamide as First-Line Treatment in Patients
Nobuaki Matsubara1, Hideaki Miyake2,3, Hiroji Uemura4
1National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Background:
In TALAPRO-2, the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor talazoparib plus the androgen receptor-signaling inhibitor enzalutamide improved radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) versus placebo plus enzalutamide (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.63; 95% CI, 0.51-0.78) in molecularly unselected patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We report an exploratory analysis of efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics in Japanese patients enrolled in the TALAPRO-2 study.
Methods:
The ongoing, multinational, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 TALAPRO-2 study enrolled patients with mCRPC receiving ongoing androgen deprivation therapy. Patients were prospectively assessed for homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene alterations and randomized 1:1 to receive talazoparib or placebo plus enzalutamide once daily. The primary endpoint was rPFS by blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary endpoints included overall survival, objective response, safety, and pharmacokinetics.
Results:
For the 116 Japanese all-comers patients enrolled in TALAPRO-2, the HR for rPFS was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.45-1.75) for the talazoparib versus placebo arm; among those with HRR-deficient disease, the HR was 0.58 (95% CI, 0.16-2.20). Among patients with BRCA1/2 gene alterations in the HRR-deficient population (n = 10), the HR for rPFS was < 0.01 (95% CI, < 0.01-not reached) for the talazoparib versus placebo arm. In the all-comers population, the objective response rate by BICR was 55% (all complete responses) in the talazoparib arm versus 36% in the placebo arm. The safety profile of talazoparib plus enzalutamide was similar between Japanese patients and the overall all-comers population; no new safety signals were identified. Anemia was the most common grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse event (55%) and cause of talazoparib discontinuation (12%). Talazoparib Ctrough was comparable across Japanese, Asian, and non-Asian subgroups.
Conclusions:
In this exploratory analysis, efficacy outcomes with talazoparib plus enzalutamide in Japanese patients in TALAPRO-2 were consistent with those in the overall all-comers population. The safety profile and pharmacokinetics of the combination were similar between Japanese patients and the overall all-comers population.
Trial Registration:
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03395197.
More Related Videos
07:25A Bioluminescent and Fluorescent Orthotopic Syngeneic Murine Model of Androgen-dependent and Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
Published on: March 6, 2018
10:27Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
Published on: July 25, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Treatment Resistent Cancers
Pharmacogenetics of Phase II Enzymes: N-acetyltransferase, Thiopurine S-methyltransferase, UDP-glucuronosyltransferase