Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2025

Monitoring Pedogenic Inorganic Carbon Accumulation Due to Weathering of Amended Silicate Minerals in Agricultural Soils.
Published on: June 4, 2021
Petrological controls on the engineering properties of carbonate aggregates through a machine learning approach
Javid Hussain1,2,3,4, Tehseen Zafar5, Xiaodong Fu1,2,3,4
1State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock, and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, 430071, China.
Abstract:
Rock aggregates have been extensively exploited in the construction sector, and the associated engineering features play a critical role in their application. The main aim of this research is to assess the impact of petrographic characteristics on the engineering properties of carbonate rocks. A total of 45 carbonate rock samples from different geological formations within the Salt Range (Western Himalayan Ranges, Pakistan) were subjected to comprehensive petrographic analyses and standard aggregate quality control tests. The engineering characteristics encompassed Los Angeles abrasion value, aggregate crushing value, aggregate impact value, specific gravity, water absorption, and unconfined compressive strength, whereas petrographic examination of thin sections quantified the mineralogical composition. Statistical methods and machine learning models have been applied to elucidate the relationships between the petrographic and engineering features of the aggregates and establish potential predictive capability. The analysis identified clay, calcite, feldspar, and dolomite as the primary determinants for the engineering behavior of carbonate aggregates. Although multiple regression analyses produced R² values exceeding 0.84, the multiple regression equations did not provide substantial insights into the impact of all petrographic parameters on engineering properties. To enhance predictive accuracy, advanced machine learning models, including Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, Multi-Layer Perceptron, and Categorical Boosting, were applied. Among these, the Gradient Boosting model demonstrated superior predictive capability, overcoming both traditional regression methods and other machine learning algorithms as validated through the Taylor diagram and ranking system (i.e., r = 0.998, R² = 997, Root mean square error = 0.075, Variance Accounted For = 99.50%, Mean Absolute Percentage Error = 0.385%, Alpha 20 Index = 100, and performance index = 0.975). These results highlight the ability of machine learning techniques to provide a more effective and reliable prediction of aggregate engineering properties based on petrographic data. This approach offers significant advantages in the preliminary assessment of aggregate suitability, contributing to more efficient resource allocation in construction projects.
Related Concept Videos
Aggregates Classification
Petrographic classification groups aggregates based on common mineralogical characteristics. Some of the common mineral groups found in aggregates are...
Shape and Texture of Coarse Aggregate
Deleterious Substances in Aggregate
Another type of impurity is clay and fine material that...
Unsoundness of Aggregate due to Volume Change
Design Example: Aggregate Gradation
The grading, or particle-size distribution, of sand is determined using sieve analysis, with standard sizes ranging from 150 μm to 10 mm (ASTM No. 100 sieve to 3⁄8 in. sieve). Sand is...
Types of Aggregate Grading
Well-graded aggregates include a complete range of necessary size fractions that fit together to create a dense matrix with minimal voids, represented by a smooth, continuous gradation curve. This type of grading ensures good...

