Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity01:25

Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity

1.2K
Mutagenicity and carcinogenicity refer to the ability of drugs to cause genetic defects and induce cancer, respectively. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies agents into four groups based on their carcinogenic potential. Group 1 agents are known human carcinogens; group 2A agents are probably carcinogenic to humans; group 3 agents lack data to support their role in carcinogenesis; and group 4 includes agents for which data support that they are not likely to be...
1.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Brain endothelial Gα<sub>q/11</sub> signalling in cerebrovascular function and cognition of aged mice.

EBioMedicine·2026
Same author

Thyrotropin-releasing hormone neurons of different hypothalamic nuclei increase energy expenditure.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Nitrosamine Ames Data Review and Method Development: proceedings of a US FDA/HESI workshop.

Mutagenesis·2026
Same author

Ames concordance with the in vivo transgenic rodent (TGR) gene mutation assay for NDSRIs and relative in vivo TGR potency with nitrosamines with robust dose-response carcinogenicity data.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2026
Same author

HyperSBINN: A Hypernetwork-Enhanced Systems Biology-Informed Neural Network for Efficient Drug Cardiosafety Assessment.

Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology·2026
Same author

A Simple Framework for Collaborative Development of Predictive Models Trained on Proprietary Data.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 4, 2025

Advanced 3D Liver Models for In vitro Genotoxicity Testing Following Long-Term Nanomaterial Exposure
08:25

Advanced 3D Liver Models for In vitro Genotoxicity Testing Following Long-Term Nanomaterial Exposure

Published on: June 5, 2020

6.7K

Machine learning enhances genotoxicity assessment using MultiFlow® DNA damage assay.

Panuwat Trairatphisan1, Lena Dorsheimer1, Peter Monecke1

  • 1Research and Development, Preclinical Safety, Sanofi, Industriepark Hoechst, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis
|December 31, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Machine learning models accurately predict the mode of action for genotoxicity using MultiFlow® DNA damage assay (MFA) data. This approach enhances pharmaceutical safety assessments by improving the precision of genotoxicity testing.

Keywords:
DNA damage biomarkergenotoxicitygraphical user interfacemachine learningmodel deploymentmodel developmentvisualization

More Related Videos

Cell Cycle-specific Measurement of &#947;H2AX and Apoptosis After Genotoxic Stress by Flow Cytometry
08:21

Cell Cycle-specific Measurement of γH2AX and Apoptosis After Genotoxic Stress by Flow Cytometry

Published on: September 1, 2019

13.4K
The Lambda Select cII Mutation Detection System
07:08

The Lambda Select cII Mutation Detection System

Published on: April 26, 2018

7.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 4, 2025

Advanced 3D Liver Models for In vitro Genotoxicity Testing Following Long-Term Nanomaterial Exposure
08:25

Advanced 3D Liver Models for In vitro Genotoxicity Testing Following Long-Term Nanomaterial Exposure

Published on: June 5, 2020

6.7K
Cell Cycle-specific Measurement of &#947;H2AX and Apoptosis After Genotoxic Stress by Flow Cytometry
08:21

Cell Cycle-specific Measurement of γH2AX and Apoptosis After Genotoxic Stress by Flow Cytometry

Published on: September 1, 2019

13.4K
The Lambda Select cII Mutation Detection System
07:08

The Lambda Select cII Mutation Detection System

Published on: April 26, 2018

7.9K

Area of Science:

  • Pharmacology and Toxicology
  • Computational Chemistry
  • Biotechnology

Background:

  • Genotoxicity testing is crucial for pharmaceutical safety assessment.
  • Mechanistic assays like the MultiFlow® DNA damage assay (MFA) provide insights into DNA damage pathways.
  • Machine learning (ML) has shown potential in enhancing the classification of genotoxicant modes of action (MoA).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate ML models for predicting the MoA of genotoxicity using MFA data.
  • To improve the accuracy and reliability of genotoxicity risk assessment for pharmaceuticals.
  • To create a user-friendly tool for analyzing MFA data and MoA predictions.

Main Methods:

  • Application of state-of-the-art ML algorithms from the R package 'caret' to MFA data.
  • Integration of molecular descriptors from in silico models to enhance model performance.
  • Development of a graphical user interface using the R package 'shiny' for data visualization and analysis.
  • Validation of models on training, internal test, and external test datasets.

Main Results:

  • The best ML model achieved 95% accuracy on the training dataset and correctly predicted genotoxicity in 16 out of 17 cases in the test dataset.
  • Incorporating molecular descriptors improved performance, particularly for complex pharmaceutical cases.
  • External validation on 49 compounds demonstrated high model accuracy at 92%.
  • A user-friendly graphical interface was developed to facilitate broad laboratory use.

Conclusions:

  • ML models, when tailored, can significantly enhance the precision of MoA determination in genotoxicity testing.
  • The developed approach offers a robust method for genotoxicity assessment, aiding in pharmaceutical safety evaluations.
  • Integration of MoA predictions can serve as valuable evidence in regulatory genotoxicity assessment workflows.