Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2025

Emergency Undocking in Robotic Surgery: A Simulation Curriculum
Published on: May 20, 2018
How We Really WHO: Assessing Completeness, Team Engagement, Distractions and Authority Gradient During 'Time Out'
Wai Yoong1, Suzanne Reilly1, Hashviniya Sekar1
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, North Middlesex University Hospital, London, UK.
The WHO Safer Surgery Checklist's "Time Out" is often not fully implemented, with distractions and low team engagement impacting its effectiveness in obstetrics and gynaecology. Improving awareness is key to enhancing surgical safety.
Area of Science:
- Medical Safety
- Surgical Procedures
- Healthcare Quality Improvement
Background:
- The World Health Organization (WHO) Safer Surgery Checklist is intended to improve patient safety.
- Anecdotal evidence suggests the checklist, particularly the "Time Out" component, may be treated as a procedural formality rather than a tool for active engagement.
- Variable team engagement and efficacy have been reported, potentially undermining the checklist's intended benefits.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the quality and completeness of the "Time Out" phase of the WHO Safer Surgery Checklist.
- To assess the level of team engagement during surgical procedures in obstetrics and gynaecology.
- To identify factors, such as distractions and authority gradients, that influence team communication and participation during "Time Out".
Main Methods:
- An observational study was conducted across 70 obstetrics and gynaecology cases.
- Data collected included the percentage of "Time Out" items correctly addressed, the type and duration of distractions, and team engagement levels.
- The Visual Analogue Scale was used to assess the authority gradient and the likelihood of team members speaking up.
Main Results:
- "Time Out" was announced in 91.4% of cases and performed in all, but not always with the correct "challenge and response" format.
- An average of 92% of "Time Out" items were appropriately challenged and responded to, with a mean duration of 92 seconds.
- Significant distractions (auditory, visual, chatter, traffic) were noted, and in 92.8% of cases, at least two team members were disengaged, performing non-essential tasks. The likelihood of speaking up was high (8.78/10) and independent of role.
Conclusions:
- Despite being performed, "Time Out" procedures are frequently not clearly announced or completed using the intended "challenge and response" method.
- "Time Out" is often compromised by avoidable distractions and suboptimal team engagement, reducing its potential effectiveness.
- Enhanced awareness and adherence to proper "Time Out" protocols are crucial for ensuring complete team involvement and maximizing surgical safety.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of apical pulse
Assessing the apical pulse is a critical nursing procedure, particularly indicated for:
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
Tracheostomy Care II: Procedure
Step 1: Perform hand hygiene, and put on personal protective equipment: gown, gloves, mask...
Assessment of apical radial pulse
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation

