Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Acoustic-reflex dynamics and the loudness-discomfort level.

D G Greenfield, T L Wiley, M G Block

    The Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders
    |February 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary

    Acoustic reflex measures did not reliably predict an individual's Loudness Discomfort Level (LDL). This study found significant variability across subjects, concluding that acoustic reflex testing is not warranted for estimating LDL.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    A NOTE ON SKIN GRAFTING.

    British medical journal·2010
    Same author

    Congenital Eye and Heart Defects.

    Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine·2009
    Same author

    Hydatid Cysts of the Liver.

    Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine·2009
    Same author

    The use of hearing protection devices by older adults during recreational noise exposure.

    Noise & health·2007
    Same author

    Diphtheria and hearing loss.

    Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)·2002
    Same author

    Hearing sensitivity in adults screened for selected risk factors.

    Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2001

    Area of Science:

    • Audiology
    • Auditory Physiology
    • Psychoacoustics

    Background:

    • Loudness Discomfort Level (LDL) is crucial for audiological assessments.
    • Acoustic reflex measures are objective indicators of auditory system response.
    • The relationship between acoustic reflex magnitude and perceived loudness requires further investigation.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the hypothesis that acoustic reflex magnitudes are proportionally equal at an individual's LDL.
    • To determine the reliability and variability of acoustic reflex growth functions across different signal types and subjects.
    • To assess the potential of using acoustic reflex measures for estimating LDL.

    Main Methods:

    • Collected acoustic reflex growth functions and LDL measures from 15 normal-hearing subjects.
    • Measured reflex growth functions using 1000-Hz tone, 4000-Hz tone, and broadband noise.
    • Analyzed reflex measures including impedance and reactance changes at LDL across subjects and trials.

    Main Results:

    • Acoustic reflex and loudness measures showed good within-subject reliability.
    • Significant inter-subject variability was observed in acoustic reflex magnitudes at LDL.
    • The experimental hypothesis was not supported by the collected data.

    Conclusions:

    • The use of acoustic reflex measures to estimate an individual's LDL is not supported by this research.
    • Large individual differences in acoustic reflex responses limit their predictive value for LDL.
    • Further research may be needed to explore alternative objective measures for LDL estimation.

    Related Experiment Videos