Text Messaging Versus Postal Reminders to Improve Participation in a Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: Randomized
Nuria Vives1,2, Gemma Binefa1,2,3, Noemie Travier1,2
1Catalan Institut of Oncology, Hospitalet del Llobregat, Spain.
JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth
|January 1, 2025
Summary
SMS text message reminders did not improve colorectal cancer screening participation initially. However, a second postal reminder significantly boosted participation, suggesting a combined approach is most effective.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Preventive Medicine
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Mobile phone SMS text message reminders have shown moderate success in enhancing participation in colorectal cancer screening programs.
- Assessing SMS effectiveness as a replacement for postal reminders in fecal immunochemical test-based screening is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of SMS text messages versus traditional postal reminders for colorectal cancer screening.
- To determine the impact of a recovery strategy involving a second postal reminder for non-responders in the SMS group.
Main Methods:
- A randomized controlled trial was conducted with individuals aged 50-69 years.
- The intervention group received SMS reminders, while the control group received postal reminders.
- Participation rates were analyzed using logistic regression, adjusting for confounders.
Main Results:
- Initial SMS reminders led to lower participation (17.2%) compared to postal reminders (21.9%).
- A recovery strategy with a second postal reminder increased SMS group participation to 23%.
- The final analysis showed higher participation in the intervention group (29.3%) versus the control group (26.5%) after the recovery strategy.
Conclusions:
- Replacing postal reminders with SMS alone decreased participation.
- A dual-reminder strategy (SMS followed by postal) significantly improved colorectal cancer screening uptake.
- Further research is needed to optimize reminder timing and frequency for maximum participation without being intrusive.


