Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

In Vivo, Percutaneous, Needle Based, Optical Coherence Tomography of Renal Masses
Published on: March 30, 2015
First clinical utility of sensing Ultrasound Localization Microscopy (sULM): identifying renal pseudotumors
Sylvain Bodard1,2,3,4, Louise Denis2, Georges Chabouh2
1AP-HP, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, Service d'Imagerie Adulte, Université de Paris Cité, F-75015, Paris, France.
None:
Rationale: Renal pseudotumors, which mimic tumors on imaging, pose diagnostic challenges that can lead to unnecessary interventions. Sensing ultrasound localization microscopy (sULM) is an advanced imaging technique that uses ultrasound imaging and microbubbles as sensors to visualize kidney functional units. This study aims to investigate whether sULM could differentiate between renal pseudotumors and tumors based on the presence of glomeruli. Methods: Eleven patients (6 tumors, 6 pseudotumors - 1 patient with 2 pseudotumors) were included. Data on patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and sULM metrics were collected. Glomeruli were quantified and compared among tumors, pseudotumors, and renal cortex using sULM. Additional metrics, i.e., normalized speed and dispersity, were also analyzed. Results: Renal tumors exhibited fewer detected glomeruli paths (mean: 10 ± 6 /cm2 [range: 4-20]) compared to pseudotumors (26 ± 5 /cm2 [19-32], p < 0.001) and normal renal cortex (26 ± 6 /cm2 [15-35], p < 0.01). Tumors displayed lower dispersity (0.13 ± 0.06 arbitrary units [a.u.] [0.07-0.20]) than both the renal cortex (0.3 ± 0.1 a.u. [0.1-0.4], p = 0.0012) and pseudotumors (0.22 ± 0.05 a.u. [0.16-0.25], p = 0.0389), and lower normalized speeds of 0.08 ± 0.04 without units (w.u.) [range: 0.03-0.17] compared to the renal cortex (0.18 ± 0.07 w.u. [0.11-0.28], p = 0.0014) and pseudotumors (0.14 ± 0.02 w.u. [0.12-0.16], p = 0.0497). sULM could effectively differentiate renal pseudotumors from tumors based on glomerular detection and metrics estimation. Conclusion: This initial exploration into the clinical utility of sULM suggests it could provide a noninvasive tool to support patient management, particularly for individuals with contraindications to conventional imaging methods. Further studies are needed to confirm these preliminary findings.

