Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Olfaction01:25

Olfaction

The sense of smell is achieved through the activities of the olfactory system. It starts when an airborne odorant enters the nasal cavity and reaches olfactory epithelium (OE). The OE is protected by a thin layer of mucus, which also serves the purpose of dissolving more complex compounds into simpler chemical odorants. The size of the OE and the density of sensory neurons varies among species; in humans, the OE is only about 9-10 cm2.
The olfactory receptors are embedded in the cilia of the...
Physiology of Smell and Olfactory Pathway01:20

Physiology of Smell and Olfactory Pathway

Humans detect odors with the help of specialized cells located in the upper part of the nasal cavity, called olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs). ORNs possess hair-like structures called cilia, which are receptive to sensations from the inhaled air. When an odorant molecule binds to a specific receptor on the cell of the cilia, it leads to a series of events that ultimately cause the ORN to send electrical signals to the olfactory bulb in the brain through the olfactory nerves.
The olfactory...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multiomics Integration Prioritizes ZFP36L1 as a Candidate Susceptibility Gene Associated With Inflammatory and Angiogenic Pathways in Diabetic Retinopathy.

Journal of diabetes research·2026
Same author

Metabolomics reveals the chemical basis of quality formation in GABA-enriched fermented green tea by lactic acid bacteria.

Food research international (Ottawa, Ont.)·2026
Same author

Exosomal immune decoy integrates cfDNA scavenging and mTOR inhibition for synergistic lupus nephritis therapy.

Theranostics·2026
Same author

Mutational Landscape and Treatment Response in Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Single-Center Real-World Analysis.

Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)·2026
Same author

Moderate thinning enhances soil water and its temporal stability in Chinese pine plantations on the semi-arid Loess Plateau of China.

Frontiers in plant science·2026
Same author

Turnover Intention and Associated Factors Among Night-Shift Midwives in China: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Journal of nursing management·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 20, 2026

A Free-breathing fMRI Method to Study Human Olfactory Function
10:42

A Free-breathing fMRI Method to Study Human Olfactory Function

Published on: July 30, 2017

9.5K

Evaluation method of Driver's olfactory preferences: a machine learning model based on multimodal physiological

Bangbei Tang1,2, Mingxin Zhu1,3, Zhian Hu2

  • 1School of Intelligent Manufacturing Engineering, Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences, Chongqing, China.

Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
|January 2, 2025
PubMed
Summary

This study uses machine learning and physiological signals to classify drivers' olfactory preferences, achieving 88% accuracy with a decision tree model. This approach enhances driving comfort by understanding odor preferences.

Keywords:
driving comfortin-vehicle fragrancemachine learningolfactory preferencephysiological signal

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Exploring Olfactory Influences on Corticospinal Excitability - Insights and Innovations in Neurological Research
06:13

Author Spotlight: Exploring Olfactory Influences on Corticospinal Excitability - Insights and Innovations in Neurological Research

Published on: January 19, 2024

926
Constructing an Olfactometer for Rodent Olfactory Behavior Studies Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling
08:36

Constructing an Olfactometer for Rodent Olfactory Behavior Studies Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling

Published on: April 11, 2025

132

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 20, 2026

A Free-breathing fMRI Method to Study Human Olfactory Function
10:42

A Free-breathing fMRI Method to Study Human Olfactory Function

Published on: July 30, 2017

9.5K
Author Spotlight: Exploring Olfactory Influences on Corticospinal Excitability - Insights and Innovations in Neurological Research
06:13

Author Spotlight: Exploring Olfactory Influences on Corticospinal Excitability - Insights and Innovations in Neurological Research

Published on: January 19, 2024

926
Constructing an Olfactometer for Rodent Olfactory Behavior Studies Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling
08:36

Constructing an Olfactometer for Rodent Olfactory Behavior Studies Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling

Published on: April 11, 2025

132

Area of Science:

  • Physiological signal processing
  • Machine learning applications
  • Human-computer interaction

Background:

  • Assessing driver olfactory preferences is crucial for improving the driving environment and comfort.
  • Current evaluation methods (subjective, EEG, behavioral) have limitations in availability and objectivity.
  • Autonomic response signals offer a potential objective measure for olfactory preference assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate machine learning models for classifying driver olfactory preferences using physiological signals.
  • To investigate the effectiveness of autonomic response signals (heart rate variability, electrodermal activity, respiratory signals) for this classification task.
  • To compare the performance of different machine learning algorithms in predicting olfactory preferences.

Main Methods:

  • Collected a dataset of 132 olfactory preference samples from 33 drivers in real driving conditions.
  • Extracted physiological features including heart rate variability, electrodermal activity, and respiratory signals.
  • Applied baseline processing to physiological data to mitigate environmental and individual variations.
  • Trained and evaluated six machine learning models: Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, Decision Tree, Random Forest, K-Nearest Neighbors, and Naive Bayes.

Main Results:

  • All tested machine learning models demonstrated effectiveness in classifying driver olfactory preferences.
  • The Decision Tree model achieved the highest classification accuracy (88%) and F1-score (0.87).
  • Baseline processing of physiological data led to a significant improvement in model performance, increasing accuracy by 3.50% and F1-score by 6.33%.

Conclusions:

  • Physiological signals combined with machine learning provide an effective method for classifying drivers' olfactory preferences.
  • This approach offers a promising avenue for objectively assessing and understanding driver odor preferences.
  • The findings can contribute to creating more comfortable and personalized driving experiences through optimized odor environments.