Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Effects of feedback01:24

Effects of feedback

456
Feedback in control systems plays a critical role in shaping various operational parameters, extending beyond simple error reduction to influence stability, bandwidth, gain, impedance, and sensitivity. Understanding these effects requires examining a basic feedback system characterized by defined input, output, error, and feedback signals.
Feedback significantly modifies the gain of a control system. The gain of a system without feedback is altered by a factor of one plus GH, where G represents...
456
Feedback Inhibition00:46

Feedback Inhibition

53.3K
Biochemical reactions are occurring constantly in cells, converting starting substances to different products, usually with the help of enzymes that speed the reactions. Without enzymes, it would take far too long for most reactions to occur to be useful to the cell!
53.3K
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

5.1K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
5.1K
Feedback Loops01:01

Feedback Loops

52.6K
In most cases, excessive hormone production is prevented by negative feedback—a loop that starts with a stimulus inducing the release of a particular substance, like a hormone, to maintain a certain level before triggering a signal that results in a decrease in further release of the hormone.
52.6K
Review and Preview01:10

Review and Preview

6.8K
In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
6.8K
Influence of Parents and Peers on Identity01:23

Influence of Parents and Peers on Identity

24
Adolescence is a pivotal period of identity formation, during which individuals begin to answer questions central to their sense of self, such as "Who am I?" and "Who do I hope to become?" Both parents and peers play critical roles in guiding adolescents through this complex developmental phase.
Parental Influence on Identity Development
Parents serve as primary guides and managers in an adolescent's life, offering support instrumental in decision-making and personal growth....
24

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Tips for writing effective abstracts.

Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners·2025
Same author

The importance of knowing what your nursing credentials mean.

Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners·2025
Same author

Working with conference planners for maximum efficiency.

Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners·2025
Same author

Understanding document statistics: An approach to enhance the author's work.

Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners·2024
Same author

Guest Editorial: Annual Education Update.

Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners·2024
Same author

Doctor of Nursing Practice-prepared academics: Promotion and tenure-eligible?

Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners·2024
Same journal

A low-cost approach to national surveys of the nurse practitioner workforce in a resource-constrained environment.

Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners·2026
Same journal

Drug pricing policy and its impact on clinical practice.

Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners·2026
Same journal

From curiosity to clinical relevance: Rethinking genetic mosaicism.

Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners·2026
Same journal

Preclinical objective structured clinical examination for Family Nurse Practitioner students: Impact on clinical confidence and perceptions of curricular integration.

Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners·2026
Same journal

Under fire: Federal policy shifts and the impact on gender minority college students.

Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners·2026
Same journal

Metastatic pleural mesothelioma presenting as ulcerated submucosal colonic nodules.

Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 7, 2025

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts
07:56

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts

Published on: January 29, 2018

17.4K

Peer review comments: Friend or foe?

Rodney W Hicks1

  • 1College of Graduate Nursing, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, California.

Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners
|January 2, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Peer review provides essential feedback for manuscript revision. Authors should carefully consider reviewer comments to improve scientific clarity and validate research findings.

More Related Videos

A Modified Trier Social Stress Test for Vulnerable Mexican American Adolescents
06:15

A Modified Trier Social Stress Test for Vulnerable Mexican American Adolescents

Published on: July 10, 2017

12.7K
How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry
14:34

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry

Published on: November 10, 2010

75.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 7, 2025

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts
07:56

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts

Published on: January 29, 2018

17.4K
A Modified Trier Social Stress Test for Vulnerable Mexican American Adolescents
06:15

A Modified Trier Social Stress Test for Vulnerable Mexican American Adolescents

Published on: July 10, 2017

12.7K
How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry
14:34

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry

Published on: November 10, 2010

75.1K

Area of Science:

  • Scientific publishing
  • Academic research
  • Scholarly communication

Background:

  • Peer review is a critical process in academic publishing.
  • Reviewers provide feedback to enhance manuscript quality and scientific validity.
  • Author responses to feedback vary, ranging from acceptance to rejection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline the importance of peer review in scholarly publishing.
  • To discuss the author's role in responding to reviewer feedback.
  • To provide guidance on effectively handling peer review comments.

Main Methods:

  • Review of established practices in academic peer review.
  • Analysis of authorial responses to editorial and reviewer critiques.
  • Compilation of strategies for constructive engagement with feedback.

Main Results:

  • Peer review serves to refine manuscripts and ensure scientific rigor.
  • Authorial perception of feedback can influence revision outcomes.
  • Prompt and thoughtful revision is crucial for publication success.

Conclusions:

  • Effective handling of peer review feedback is essential for authors.
  • Constructive engagement with the peer review process improves scientific communication.
  • Understanding and applying reviewer comments leads to better-quality publications.