Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2025

06:16
Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
312
Cost-effectiveness of a multicancer early detection test in the US
Anuraag R Kansal1, Ali Tafazzoli, Alissa Shaul
1GRAIL, Inc., 1525 O'Brien Dr, Menlo Park, CA 94025.
The American Journal of Managed Care
|January 2, 2025
Summary
Multicancer early detection (MCED) tests can lead to earlier cancer diagnosis, improving survival and reducing costs. This study found MCED testing to be cost-effective across various clinical scenarios.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Health Economics
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Multicancer early detection (MCED) testing aims to diagnose cancers earlier, potentially improving patient survival and reducing healthcare expenditures.
- Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of MCED testing is crucial for its clinical implementation, especially considering factors like clinical uncertainty and population heterogeneity.
- A broad coverage MCED test for solid tumors could significantly impact cancer care pathways.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of multicancer early detection (MCED) testing combined with usual care (UC) screening compared to UC alone.
- To analyze the impact of clinical uncertainties and population heterogeneity on the cost-effectiveness of MCED testing.
- To assess the economic value of MCED testing from a US payer perspective over a lifetime horizon.
Main Methods:
- A hybrid cohort-level model was utilized to compare annual MCED testing plus UC versus UC alone in a US adult population (aged 50-79).
- The model incorporated a lifetime horizon and a US payer perspective.
- Sensitivity and scenario analyses were performed to address clinical uncertainties, including differential survival, cancer progression rates, and implementation strategies.
Main Results:
- MCED testing plus UC identified 7200 additional cancers at earlier stages per 100,000 individuals compared to UC alone.
- This approach resulted in an average gain of 0.14 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and treatment cost savings of $5241 per person.
- The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was $66,048 per QALY gained at a test price of $949, with probabilistic sensitivity analyses indicating cost-effectiveness under various scenarios.
Conclusions:
- Multicancer early detection (MCED) testing, when combined with usual care, is estimated to be cost-effective under a range of plausible clinical scenarios.
- MCED testing demonstrates the potential to improve cancer survival rates.
- The implementation of MCED testing is associated with reductions in overall cancer treatment costs.

