Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Cochlea01:13

The Cochlea

44.5K
The cochlea is a coiled structure in the inner ear that contains hair cells—the sensory receptors of the auditory system. Sound waves are transmitted to the cochlea by small bones attached to the eardrum called the ossicles, which vibrate the oval window that leads to the inner ear. This causes fluid in the chambers of the cochlea to move, vibrating the basilar membrane.
44.5K
Hearing01:31

Hearing

51.8K
When we hear a sound, our nervous system is detecting sound waves—pressure waves of mechanical energy traveling through a medium. The frequency of the wave is perceived as pitch, while the amplitude is perceived as loudness.
51.8K
Auditory Pathway01:15

Auditory Pathway

4.6K
Auditory pathways constitute the complex neural circuits responsible for transmitting and interpreting auditory information from the peripheral auditory system to the brain. Sound waves are initially captured by the outer ear, funneled through the ear canal, and reach the tympanic membrane (eardrum). These vibrations are transmitted via the middle ear's ossicles to the inner ear's cochlea.
When viewed cross-sectionally, the cochlea reveals the scala vestibuli and scala tympani flanking...
4.6K
Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location01:21

Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location

191
The human brain perceives pitch through two primary mechanisms reflected in place theory and frequency theory. Each mechanism describes how sound waves are interpreted as specific pitches by the brain, offering insights into the intricate processes of auditory perception.
Place theory, or place coding, suggests that different pitches are heard because various sound waves activate specific locations along the cochlea's basilar membrane. The brain determines the pitch of a sound by...
191
Hair Cells01:22

Hair Cells

40.0K
Hair cells are the sensory receptors of the auditory system—they transduce mechanical sound waves into electrical energy that the nervous system can understand. Hair cells are located in the organ of Corti within the cochlea of the inner ear, between the basilar and tectorial membranes. The actual sensory receptors are called inner hair cells. The outer hair cells serve other functions, such as sound amplification in the cochlea, and are not discussed in detail here.
40.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Leveraging spatial cues from cochlear implant microphones to efficiently enhance speech separation in naturalistic listening scenes.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Machine learning for risk stratification in the emergency department (MARS-ED): a randomized controlled trial.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Joint Population Coding and Temporal Coherence Link an Attended Talker's Voice and Location Features in Naturalistic Multi-talker Scenes.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2025
Same author

From vestibular implant to cortex: electrically evoked vestibular responses.

Journal of neurology·2025
Same author

Author Correction: Learning to hear again with alternating cochlear frequency allocations.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Experienced cognitive load in the emergency department. A prospective study.

PloS one·2025
Same journal

Therapeutic potential of crude protein extracts from two Egyptian freshwater snails Lanistes carinatus and Bellamya unicolor.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Microbial contamination of donor corneas and post-keratoplasty endophthalmitis: a comparison between Japanese and U.S. eye banks using cold storage.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Prevalence and contributing factors of virological non-suppression among adult patients on first-line antiretroviral therapy in tertiary hospitals in Ethiopia.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

An in vitro comparison of color stability between alkasite and different restorative materials in various staining solutions.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Toward accessible mRNA LNP formulation: systematic evaluation of mixing strategies and key parameters.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

A network analysis of personality traits, mentalizing, and psychological health in Chinese college students.

Scientific reports·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 4, 2025

Author Spotlight: Optimizing EAS with Long Electrodes for Enhanced Cochlear Coverage and Hearing Preservation
03:49

Author Spotlight: Optimizing EAS with Long Electrodes for Enhanced Cochlear Coverage and Hearing Preservation

Published on: October 11, 2024

734

Learning to hear again with alternating cochlear frequency allocations.

Marc van Hoof1, Lars Lambriks2, Kiki van der Heijden2,3

  • 1Department of ENT/Audiology & School for Mental Health and NeuroScience (MHENS), Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands. marc.hoofvan@mumc.nl.

Scientific Reports
|January 2, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Cochlear implant users show remarkable auditory plasticity, learning speech with two frequency maps simultaneously. This adaptability challenges the notion of a hard-wired auditory system, demonstrating flexibility in neural processing.

More Related Videos

A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition
07:14

A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition

Published on: October 29, 2018

6.4K
Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach
10:50

Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach

Published on: June 6, 2012

14.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 4, 2025

Author Spotlight: Optimizing EAS with Long Electrodes for Enhanced Cochlear Coverage and Hearing Preservation
03:49

Author Spotlight: Optimizing EAS with Long Electrodes for Enhanced Cochlear Coverage and Hearing Preservation

Published on: October 11, 2024

734
A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition
07:14

A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition

Published on: October 29, 2018

6.4K
Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach
10:50

Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach

Published on: June 6, 2012

14.5K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Audiology
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • The auditory pathway was traditionally considered tonotopically organized and hard-wired.
  • Cochlear implants map sound frequency-amplitude information, but the brain's adaptation to these new inputs is not fully understood.
  • Long-term sound deprivation in cochlear implant recipients presents a unique model to study auditory system plasticity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the auditory plasticity in cochlear implant recipients after prolonged sound deprivation.
  • To determine if individuals can learn speech understanding with two distinct, alternating frequency maps concurrently.
  • To assess the impact of dual-map training on auditory learning and adaptation.

Main Methods:

  • A novel study design involved cochlear implant recipients switching between two distinct frequency maps daily during rehabilitation.
  • Subjects served as their own controls, allowing for within-subject comparisons of auditory performance.
  • Speech understanding was assessed with both preferred and non-preferred frequency maps over time.

Main Results:

  • Recipients demonstrated swift and concurrent learning of speech understanding with two alternating frequency maps.
  • Auditory performance was maintained with the non-preferred (legacy) map, even after preference was established.
  • Subjects continued to improve speech understanding with their preferred map, indicating ongoing learning.
  • Processing information from two maps did not appear to deplete neural resources.

Conclusions:

  • The auditory system exhibits a higher degree of plasticity and learning flexibility than previously assumed, even after long periods of sound deprivation.
  • Cochlear implant recipients can adapt to and benefit from using multiple frequency maps, challenging the concept of a fixed tonotopic organization.
  • The findings support a new model of auditory adaptation and learning in response to cochlear implantation.
  • The study's design offers practical benefits for clinical trials, potentially reducing sample size and mitigating order effects.