Comparative evaluation of non-contrast MRI versus gadoxetic acid-enhanced abbreviated protocols in detecting colorectal liver metastases
Related Experiment Video For Abbreviated protocols
Updated: May 7, 2025
Novel In Vivo Micro-Computed Tomography Imaging Techniques for Assessing the Progression of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
Published on: March 24, 2023
Haoran Dai1,2, Cheng Yan2,3, Xi Jia2
1School of Health Science and Engineering, University of Shanghai For Science and Technolgy, Shanghai, China.
Purpose:
This study compares the diagnostic efficacy of non-contrast abbreviated MRI protocols with Gadoxetic acid-enhanced abbreviated MRI for detecting colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM), focusing on lesion characterization and surveillance.
Methods:
Ninety-four patients, including 55 with pathologically verified CRLM, were enrolled, totaling 422 lesions (287 metastatic, 135 benign). Two independent readers assessed three MRI protocols per patient: Protocol 1 included non-contrast sequences (T2-weighted turbo spin-echo, T1-weighted Dixon, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and ADC mapping). Protocol 2 included gadoxetic acid enhancement with hepatobiliary phase imaging, T2 TSE, DWI, and ADC maps. Protocol 3 utilized the standard Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced MRI sequence, which included pre-contrast T1-weighted imaging, T1-weighted Dixon sequences, post-contrast T1-weighted imaging (including arterial, portal venous, transitional and hepatobiliary phases), and additional T2-weighted and DWI sequences. Diagnoses were scored on a 5-point scale (benign = 1; malignant = 5), with scores ≥ 3 indicating CRLM. ROC curves analyzed diagnostic accuracy, comparing area under the curve (AUC) values across protocols.
Results:
No significant difference in AUCs was observed between Protocol 1 (0.899-0.909) and Protocol 2 (0.906-0.931) versus Protocol 3 (0.935-0.939) (p = 0.091-0.195). For lesions ≤ 10 mm, Protocol 1 was slightly inferior to Protocol 3 (p = 0.002-0.032), while Protocol 2 remained comparably effective (p = 0.096-0.179). These findings held when using a threshold of ≥ 4 to define CRLM.
Conclusion:
The non-enhanced abbreviated MRI protocol is as effective as the gadoxetic acid-enhanced protocol in identifying CRLM. The proposed Ab-MRI approach may be a viable alternative for CRLM surveillance.
Critical Relevance Statement:
The non-enhanced abbreviated MRI (Ab-MRI) protocol is as effective as the gadoxetic acid-enhanced protocol in identifying colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). The proposed Ab-MRI approach may be a viable alternative for CRLM surveillance.
Key Points:
Two abbreviated protocols are proposed for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) surveillance. The non-enhanced protocol showed equivalent efficacy and was more cost-effective. The non-enhanced protocol may be a viable alternative for CRLM surveillance.
Related Concept Videos
01:24Magnetic Resonance Imaging
01:14Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
01:26Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy
Radionuclide Testing
Radionuclide testing is a sophisticated medical technique for assessing gastrointestinal motility. It focuses on gastric emptying and colonic transit time. Radioactive markers track the movement of food through the digestive system, providing insights into gastrointestinal disorders.
In gastric emptying studies, a meal's liquid and...