Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2025

Characterize Disease-related Mutants of RAF Family Kinases by Using a Set of Practical and Feasible Methods
Published on: July 17, 2019
Coevolution of Atypical BRAF and KRAS Mutations in Colorectal Tumorigenesis
Connor E Woolley1, Enric Domingo1, Juan Fernandez-Tajes1
1Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
None:
BRAF mutations in colorectal cancer comprise three functional classes: class 1 (V600E) with strong constitutive activation, class 2 with pathogenic kinase activity lower than that of class 1, and class 3 which paradoxically lacks kinase activity. Non-class 1 mutations associate with better prognosis, microsatellite stability, distal tumor location, and better anti-EGFR response. An analysis of 13 colorectal cancer cohorts (n = 6,605 tumors) compared class 1 (n = 709, 10.7% of colorectal cancers), class 2 (n = 31, 0.47%), and class 3 (n = 81, 1.22%) mutations. Class 2-mutant and class 3-mutant colorectal cancers frequently co-occurred with additional Ras pathway mutations (29.0% and 45.7%, respectively, vs. 2.40% in class 1; P < 0.001), often at atypical sites (KRAS noncodon 12/13/61, NRAS, or NF1). Ras pathway activation was highest in class 1 and lowest in class 3, with a greater distal expression of EGFR ligands (amphiregulin/epiregulin) supporting weaker BRAF driver mutations. Unlike class 1 mutants, class 3 tumors resembled chromosomally unstable colorectal cancers in mutation burdens, signatures, driver mutations, and transcriptional subtypes, whereas class 2 mutants displayed intermediate characteristics. Atypical BRAF mutations were associated with longer overall survival than class 1 mutations (HR = 0.25; P = 0.011) but lost this advantage in cancers with additional Ras mutations (HR = 0.94; P = 0.86). This study supports the suggestion that class 3 BRAF mutations amplify existing Ras signaling in a two-mutation model and that the enhancement of weak/atypical Ras mutations may suffice for tumorigenesis, with potentially clinically important heterogeneity in the class 2/3 subgroup. Implications: The heterogeneous nature of BRAF-mutant colorectal cancers, particularly among class 2/3 mutations which frequently harbor additional Ras mutations, highlights the necessity of comprehensive molecular profiling.
More Related Videos
05:21Real-time Imaging of Myeloid Cells Dynamics in ApcMin/+ Intestinal Tumors by Spinning Disk Confocal Microscopy
Published on: October 6, 2014
06:44Author Spotlight: Integrating BRET-Based Assays and Rare Mutation Analysis to Decipher RAF Kinase Regulation in Live Cells
Published on: March 1, 2024
Related Concept Videos
The Ras Gene
Ras is a...
Tumor Progression
Colon cancer is one of the best-documented examples of tumor progression. Early mutation in the APC gene in colon cells causes a small growth on the colon wall called a polyp. With time, this polyp grows into a benign, pre-cancerous tumor. Further...
Small GTPases - Ras and Rho
Three regulatory proteins control their activity:
Cancers Originate from Somatic Mutations in a Single Cell
Cancer-Critical Genes I: Proto-oncogenes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...
mTOR Signaling and Cancer Progression
The mTOR pathway or the...