Should all cervical cancer patients with positive lymph node receive definitive radiotherapy: a population-based comparative study
- Yang Wang 1, Xingyu Liu 2, Jing Liu 1, Liying Liu 1, Yue Ma 3
- Yang Wang 1, Xingyu Liu 2, Jing Liu 1
- 1Department of Gynecology, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Cancer Hospital of Dalian University of Technology, No.44, Xiaoheyan Road, Dadong District, Shenyang, Liaoning, 110042, People's Republic of China.
- 2Department of General Surgery, The People's Hospital of Liaoning Province, Shenyang, Liaoning, 110067, People's Republic of China.
- 3Department of Gynecology, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Cancer Hospital of Dalian University of Technology, No.44, Xiaoheyan Road, Dadong District, Shenyang, Liaoning, 110042, People's Republic of China. mayue@cancerhosp-ln-cmu.com.
- 0Department of Gynecology, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Cancer Hospital of Dalian University of Technology, No.44, Xiaoheyan Road, Dadong District, Shenyang, Liaoning, 110042, People's Republic of China.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.For cervical cancer with lymph node metastases (LNM), surgery plus postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) improves survival in early stages (I-II) or limited lymph node spread (≤5). This benefit is not seen in advanced stages (III) or extensive lymph node involvement (>5).
Area Of Science
- Gynecologic Oncology
- Radiation Oncology
- Surgical Oncology
Background
- Optimal management for cervical cancer with lymph node metastases (LNM) is debated.
- Treatment strategies include surgery with postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) versus definitive radiotherapy (RT).
Purpose Of The Study
- To compare the survival outcomes of surgery plus PORT versus definitive RT in cervical cancer patients with LNM.
- To identify patient subgroups benefiting from specific treatment modalities.
Main Methods
- Retrospective analysis of 2936 patients with positive lymph nodes (PLNs) from the 2009 FIGO stage I-III cervical cancer cohort in the SEER database.
- Kaplan-Meier, log-rank, Cox, and interaction analyses were used to assess survival outcomes and treatment benefits.
Main Results
- Primary treatment choice significantly impacted cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS).
- Surgery plus PORT showed improved CSS and OS in stage I-II and PLNs ≤ 5 subgroups.
- No significant survival difference was found between treatments for stage III or PLNs > 5 subgroups.
Conclusions
- Surgery plus PORT offers improved outcomes for cervical cancer patients with stage I-II or ≤ 5 positive lymph nodes.
- This approach is not superior for stage III or > 5 positive lymph nodes.
- Treatment decisions for LNM should consider comprehensive assessment of lymph node burden and tumor spread.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.

