Related Concept Videos
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
Phylogenetic Trees
Phylogeny
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?
In contrast, regions which code...
Synteny and Evolution
Around 80 million years ago, the human and mice lineages diverged from the common ancestor. During the course of evolution, the ancestral...
Protein Networks
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...
You might also read
Related Articles
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
Displacement-Optimized Tanglegrams for Trees and Networks.
Predicting the depth of the most recent common ancestor of a random sample of k species: the impact of phylogenetic tree shape.
MMonitor for real-time monitoring of microbial communities using long reads.
A Dichotomy Law for Certain Classes of Phylogenetic Networks.
Slow Evolution Towards Generalism in a Model of Variable Dietary Range.
CBINN: Cancer Biology-Informed Neural Network for Unknown Parameter Estimation and Missing Physics Identification.
A Cost-Sensitive Behavioral Modeling Analysis of the Early Identification and Control of Infectious Diseases.
Tracking Dynamics of Superspreading Through Contacts, Exposures, and Transmissions in Edge-Based Network Epidemics.
The Exact Hypergeometric Posterior Method for Accurate Inference of Population Size from Mark-Recapture Data.
Modeling, Analysis, and Optimal Control of Leukemic Cell Population Dynamics Under Therapy.
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2025

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts
Published on: February 5, 2014
Transformations to Simplify Phylogenetic Networks.
Johanna Heiss1,2, Daniel H Huson1, Mike Steel3
1Institute for Bioinformatics and Medical Informatics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Biologists often simplify complex evolutionary histories by transforming phylogenetic networks into trees. The lowest stable ancestor (LSA) method consistently summarizes evolutionary trends, unlike other common approaches.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary biology
- Computational phylogenetics
- Bioinformatics
Background:
- Rooted phylogenetic trees are standard for depicting species evolution.
- Trees cannot represent reticulate events like hybridization or gene transfer.
- Rooted phylogenetic networks offer a more accurate evolutionary model but are complex.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate methods for converting phylogenetic networks to trees.
- To identify transformations that satisfy a specific consistency condition.
- To evaluate the suitability of different tree-summarization methods for phylogenetic networks.
Main Methods:
- Formal investigation of tree-transformation methods for phylogenetic networks.
- Introduction of a consistency condition for evaluating transformations.
- Analysis of the lowest stable ancestor (LSA) method and other common methods.
Main Results:
- The lowest stable ancestor (LSA) tree method satisfies the consistency property.
- Several other commonly used tree-transformation methods do not meet this condition.
- A new method introduced also fails to satisfy the consistency property.
Conclusions:
- The LSA method provides a consistent way to summarize evolutionary trends from phylogenetic networks.
- Not all methods for simplifying phylogenetic networks into trees are reliable.
- Further consideration is given to transformations into normal networks.

