Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

A Bioluminescent and Fluorescent Orthotopic Syngeneic Murine Model of Androgen-dependent and Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
Published on: March 6, 2018
Low- and High-Volume Disease in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: From CHAARTED to PSMA PET-An
Lena M Unterrainer1,2,3, Thomas A Hope4, Wolfgang P Fendler5,6
1Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California; lunterrainer@mednet.ucla.edu.
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET imaging reclassifies metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) staging compared to conventional imaging. PSMA PET downstages M0 in one-third and upstages low-volume disease to high-volume disease in one-fifth of mHSPC patients.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Radiology
- Nuclear Medicine
Background:
- High-volume disease (HVD) and low-volume disease (LVD) in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) are defined by conventional imaging (CI) and impact survival and treatment.
- The applicability of CI-based HVD/LVD definitions to prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET imaging is not well understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare CI-based disease volume criteria with PSMA PET-based volume definitions in mHSPC patients.
- To evaluate the impact of PSMA PET on disease staging compared to conventional imaging.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective multicenter study of 67 mHSPC patients who underwent both PSMA PET/CT or PET/MRI and bone scan (BS) within 100 days without new therapy.
- CHAARTED criteria for HVD/LVD were applied to CI (BS, CT, MRI) and PSMA PET.
- Whole-body tumor burden was quantified using automated bone scan index (aBSI) on BS and PSMA PET-positive tumor volume (PSMA-TV) on PSMA PET.
Main Results:
- PSMA PET identified HVD in 40.3% of patients (HVD-PET), compared to 25.4% with CI (HVD-CI).
- Stage migration occurred in 40.3% of patients: 22% of LVD-CI patients were upstaged to HVD-PET, and 30% of LVD-CI patients were downstaged to M0-PET.
- An optimal PSMA-TV threshold of 107 mL was identified to stratify LVD-CI versus HVD-CI with 21.9% misclassification.
Conclusions:
- PSMA PET imaging leads to significant stage migration in mHSPC patients compared to conventional imaging.
- M0 downstaging occurs in approximately one-third, and LVD to HVD upstaging occurs in one-fifth of patients.
- Future HVD/LVD definitions for mHSPC should be revised based on PSMA PET/CT findings and patient outcomes.

