Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Multi-section multi-echo pulse magnetic resonance techniques: optimization in a clinical setting.

J B Kneeland, R J Knowles, P T Cahill

    Radiology
    |April 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    T1rho relaxation mapping in human osteoarthritis (OA) cartilage: comparison of T1rho with T2.

    Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI·2006
    Same author

    Proteoglycan-induced changes in T1rho-relaxation of articular cartilage at 4T.

    Magnetic resonance in medicine·2001
    Same author

    Human knee: in vivo T1(rho)-weighted MR imaging at 1.5 T--preliminary experience.

    Radiology·2001
    Same author

    Articular cartilage and the magic angle effect.

    AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2001
    Same author

    The effect of observer experience on magnetic resonance imaging interpretation and localization of triangular fibrocartilage complex lesions.

    The Journal of hand surgery·2001
    Same author

    MRI of the knee: value of short echo time fast spin-echo using high performance gradients versus conventional spin-echo imaging for the detection of meniscal tears.

    Skeletal radiology·2000
    Same journal

    Erratum for: Prediction of Lobar Emphysema Progression with a CT-Based Foundational Model.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Erratum for: Associations of MRI-derived Paraspinal IMAT and LMM with Cardiometabolic Risk Factors: Results from a German Cohort.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Erratum for: Blue Rubber Bleb Nevus Syndrome.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Redefining the Clinical Role of MRI in Endometrial Cancer Staging.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    To Ablate or Not to Ablate: The Colorectal Liver Metastasis Question.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    The Limits of Radiologic Categorization in Pulmonary Nonsolid Nodules.

    Radiology·2026
    See all related articles

    This study explains user-selectable magnetic resonance imaging parameters for multi-section, multi-echo sequences. It provides a mathematical relationship and nomogram for easier parameter calculation and understanding trade-offs in imaging.

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Imaging
    • Radiology
    • Physics

    Background:

    • Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) utilizes complex pulse sequences with numerous user-selectable parameters.
    • Optimizing these parameters is crucial for balancing image quality, acquisition time, and diagnostic utility.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To describe and explain the interrelationships of user-selectable parameters in multi-section, multi-echo MRI pulse sequences.
    • To provide tools for simplifying the calculation and estimation of these parameters.
    • To illustrate the impact of parameter choices on imaging outcomes and inherent trade-offs.

    Main Methods:

    • Detailed description of key MRI parameters: repetition time (TR), echo delay time (TE), number of sections (S), number of echoes (E'), data acquisition time, and T1 recovery time.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Development of a mathematical relationship to calculate interdependent parameters.
  • Creation of a nomogram for rapid visual estimation of parameter values.

    • Main Results:

    • A clear mathematical formula is presented for calculating remaining parameters based on user specifications.
    • A nomogram allows for quick visual estimation of parameter settings.
    • The impact of parameter choices on imaging time, anatomical coverage, and image contrast is elucidated.

    Conclusions:

    • Understanding the interplay of MRI parameters is essential for efficient and effective image acquisition.
    • The provided mathematical relationship and nomogram simplify the process of selecting optimal parameters.
    • The study highlights the critical trade-offs involved in MRI sequence planning, demonstrated through a clinical pelvic imaging example.