Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Nonconscious Mimicry01:13

Nonconscious Mimicry

4.5K
Nonconscious mimicry occurs when individuals alter their mannerisms to match the behaviors and expressions of those nearby, without intention.
4.5K
Social Facilitation01:04

Social Facilitation

31.5K
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
31.5K
Levels of Communication II: Organizational, Public, and Group Dynamics01:27

Levels of Communication II: Organizational, Public, and Group Dynamics

1.6K
Effective communication is the foundation of a good organization. Communication is the lifeblood of an organization that connects the group with messages. In an organization, communication occurs in upward, downward, and horizontal lines. Downward communication travels from the administrative and senior levels to the staff through official channels such as manuals, rules and regulations, and organizational charts. Staff members initiate upward communication, which is addressed to executives and...
1.6K
Social Loafing01:37

Social Loafing

34.3K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
34.3K
Groupthink01:34

Groupthink

43.8K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
43.8K
Robbers Cave04:49

Robbers Cave

14.2K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Nonlinear Science Leaps Forward … Again.

Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences·2025
Same author

Catastrophe Modelling for Time Series of Reported Cases of COVID-19: Workload Effects in the Health Care System.

Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences·2025
Same author

Understanding the Role of Autonomic Synchrony in the Swallowtail Catastrophe Model of Leadership Emergence.

Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences·2025
Same author

Cusp Catastrophe Models and the Role of Synchrony in Cognitive Workload and Fatigue in Teams.

Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences·2025
Same author

Introduction to Emergence in Social Systems.

Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences·2025
Same author

Structural Integrity, Flexibility, and Timing: Introduction to a Special Issue on Resilience.

Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences·2024
Same journal

Interlocking Director Networks and Systemic Risk in Financial Institutions.

Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences·2026
Same journal

Investigating the Physiological Role of Fractal Pupil Oscillations.

Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences·2026
Same journal

State Space Theory as a Unifying Framework for Consciousness.

Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences·2026
Same journal

Stability in a Two-Strain Dengue Model with a Constant Recruitment.

Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences·2026
Same journal

Quantum Fractal Art: Bringing Fractals into the Age of Quantum Computing.

Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences·2025
Same journal

The "Two Worlds, Two Urns" Experiment: A Teacher's Reflection on Ergodicity and Economic Methodology.

Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences·2025
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 7, 2025

Group Synchronization During Collaborative Drawing Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
07:53

Group Synchronization During Collaborative Drawing Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy

Published on: August 5, 2022

1.9K

Simultaneous Emergent Phenomena: Leadership and Team Synchrony.

Stephen J Guastello1, Nicholas R Peters1, Anthony F Peressini1

  • 1Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI.

Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences
|January 4, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study reveals that leadership emergence in teams follows a swallowtail model, while autonomic synchrony evolves into a similar pattern over time. These findings offer insights into team dynamics and development.

More Related Videos

Inter-Brain Synchrony in Open-Ended Collaborative Learning: An fNIRS-Hyperscanning Study
04:44

Inter-Brain Synchrony in Open-Ended Collaborative Learning: An fNIRS-Hyperscanning Study

Published on: July 21, 2021

4.0K
How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study
05:33

How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study

Published on: September 8, 2021

5.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 7, 2025

Group Synchronization During Collaborative Drawing Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
07:53

Group Synchronization During Collaborative Drawing Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy

Published on: August 5, 2022

1.9K
Inter-Brain Synchrony in Open-Ended Collaborative Learning: An fNIRS-Hyperscanning Study
04:44

Inter-Brain Synchrony in Open-Ended Collaborative Learning: An fNIRS-Hyperscanning Study

Published on: July 21, 2021

4.0K
How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study
05:33

How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study

Published on: September 8, 2021

5.6K

Area of Science:

  • Complex Systems Science
  • Social Psychology
  • Organizational Behavior

Background:

  • Emergent phenomena in group dynamics are complex.
  • Simultaneous emergence of leadership and autonomic synchrony in teams is understudied.
  • Panarchy theory suggests leadership emergence (slow) may control autonomic synchrony (fast).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the co-emergence of leadership and autonomic synchrony in teams.
  • To determine if these emergent processes share similar dynamics.
  • To analyze the temporal evolution of these dynamics using statistical distributions.

Main Methods:

  • 136 undergraduates played Counter-Strike in teams of 3-5.
  • Galvanic Skin Response (GSR) sensors measured autonomic arousal.
  • Leadership behaviors were assessed via peer ratings.
  • Autonomic synchrony analyzed using driver-empath scores.

Main Results:

  • Leadership emergence followed a swallowtail catastrophe model, consistent with prior research.
  • Autonomic synchrony initially simpler, evolved into a swallowtail catastrophe.
  • Lognormal distributions were a secondary fit; inverse power laws were least descriptive.

Conclusions:

  • Leadership emergence and autonomic synchrony exhibit co-emergent dynamics, both displaying swallowtail configurations.
  • The temporal unfolding of these processes has implications for team training and development.
  • Understanding these dynamics can enhance team performance and cohesion.