Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2025

Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
Published on: July 25, 2020
Longer survival with precision medicine in late-stage cancer patients
C K Mapendano1, A K Nøhr2, M Sønderkær3
1Department of Oncology and Clinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Background:
In a per-protocol analysis of molecularly profiled patients with treatment-refractory, end-stage cancer discussed at the National Molecular Tumor Board (NMTB), we aimed to assess the overall survival (OS) outcome of targeted treatment compared with no targeted treatment.
Materials And Methods:
Patients were prospectively included at a single oncological center. Whole exome and RNA sequencing (tumor-normal) were carried out, and cases were presented at the NMTB for discussion of targeted treatment. Treatment was available through a basket trial, by compassionate use or in early clinical trials.
Results:
One hundred and ninety-six patients were included from 2020 to 2023. In all but three patients a driver variant was disclosed, while 42% had simultaneous affection of more than three oncogenic pathways. In 42% of patients a druggable target was identified but two-thirds did not receive the suggested treatment. The fraction of patients initiating treatment yearly rose from 8% to 22%. For patients treated (N = 30), the clinical benefit rate was 44% and median time on treatment was 3.5 months. Druggable targets were enriched in lung cancers, while patients receiving or not receiving targeted treatment had similar clinical characteristics. The median OS was longer for patients receiving targeted treatment (15 months), but similar for patients with no druggable target and suggested targeted treatment not initiated (5 and 6 months, respectively) (P = 0.004). In multivariate analysis, targeted treatment (hazard ratio 0.43, confidence interval 0.25-0.72), few metastatic sites, and adenocarcinoma histology were predictive of improved OS while alterations of the RTK/RAS pathway were prognostically unfavorable.
Conclusions:
Tissue-agnostic targeted treatment based on molecular tumor profiling is possible in an increasing fraction of end-stage cancer patients. In those who receive targeted treatment, results strongly suggest a significant survival benefit.
Insights
Molecular profiling identified actionable targets in most end-stage cancer patients. Targeted treatments significantly improved overall survival (OS) for those receiving them, highlighting the benefit of precision oncology.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Genomics
- Precision Medicine
Background:
- End-stage cancer patients often lack effective treatment options.
- Molecular tumor boards (NMTB) evaluate complex cases for targeted therapies.
- Assessing overall survival (OS) for targeted treatment in refractory cancers is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the overall survival (OS) outcomes of targeted cancer treatments.
- To compare outcomes between targeted treatment and no targeted treatment in end-stage cancer.
- To analyze the feasibility and impact of molecular profiling in guiding cancer therapy.
Main Methods:
- Prospective inclusion of patients at a single oncological center.
- Whole exome and RNA sequencing for molecular profiling.
- Presentation of cases at the National Molecular Tumor Board (NMTB) for treatment recommendations.
Main Results:
- Driver variants identified in most patients; 42% had multiple affected pathways.
- Actionable targets were found in 42%, but only one-third received recommended treatment.
- Median OS was 15 months with targeted treatment versus 5-6 months without, a significant difference (P=0.004).
- Multivariate analysis identified targeted treatment, fewer metastatic sites, and adenocarcinoma histology as positive predictors of OS.
Conclusions:
- Tissue-agnostic targeted treatment is increasingly feasible for end-stage cancer patients.
- Molecular profiling and targeted therapy offer a significant survival benefit.
- Challenges remain in treatment initiation despite identified druggable targets.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Cancer Survival Analysis

