Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2025

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Informative censoring in externally controlled clinical trials: a potential source of bias
T Rudra Gupta1, D E Schwartz1, R Saha1
1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA; Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, USA.
Informative censoring in external control data can bias cancer clinical trial results, affecting statistical power and error rates. Researchers must account for this bias when using external data in trial designs.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Trials
- Biostatistics
- Cancer Research
Background:
- External data use in cancer clinical trials is common but can introduce bias.
- Informative censoring, a statistical dependence between censoring and survival times, is an often-overlooked bias source.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of informative censoring of external controls on cancer clinical trial outcomes.
- To evaluate how informative censoring affects bias, type I error, and power in simulated cancer trials.
Main Methods:
- Simulations of single-arm and randomized controlled cancer clinical trials.
- Inclusion of model-based replicates and in silico glioblastoma trials.
- Modeling of informative censoring with positive or negative associations between censoring and survival times.
Main Results:
- Informative censoring of external control data demonstrably biases cancer clinical trial results.
- The direction and magnitude of bias are dependent on the specific censoring mechanism.
- Informative censoring can lead to inflation or reduction of type I error and statistical power.
Conclusions:
- Clinical trial designs incorporating external data must address the risk of bias from informative censoring.
- Analyses to detect informative censoring are crucial for trials utilizing external control data.
Related Concept Videos
Censoring Survival Data
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Blinding
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Blind Procedures

