Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2025

A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound
Published on: March 21, 2025
Prognostic Value of Response Evaluation Using PSMA PET/CT in Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer (RECIP 1.0): A
Felipe A Mourato1, Luiza G Schmitt2, Miriana Mariussi3
1Unidade de Diagnóstico por Imagem, Empresa Brasileira de Serviços Hospitalares (EBSERH), Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE), Recife, PE, Brazil (F.A.M.).
The Response Evaluation Using PSMA PET/CT in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (RECIP 1.0) criteria show strong prognostic value. This systematic review confirms RECIP 1.0 effectively predicts treatment outcomes in metastatic prostate cancer patients.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Nuclear Medicine
- Radiology
Background:
- Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT is crucial for evaluating treatment response in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
- Traditional criteria like PERCIST 1.0 have limitations.
- The RECIP 1.0 system was developed to improve response assessment using PSMA PET/CT.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and meta-analyze the prognostic performance of RECIP 1.0.
- To evaluate RECIP 1.0's ability to predict treatment outcomes in mCRPC patients.
- To compare RECIP 1.0 with other criteria like PSMA PET Progression Criteria (PPP).
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases up to March 2024.
- Inclusion of studies assessing therapeutic response in mCRPC patients using PSMA PET/CT and RECIP 1.0 criteria.
- Pooled analysis of hazard ratios for mortality and concordance indices (c-index); secondary head-to-head comparison with PPP.
Main Results:
- Eight studies (516 patients) met eligibility criteria; six were included in quantitative analysis.
- RECIP 1.0 significantly differentiated mortality risk between disease progression and non-progression (HR: 3.48).
- Pooled c-index for RECIP 1.0 was 0.68; a non-significant trend favored RECIP 1.0 over PPP in head-to-head comparisons.
Conclusions:
- RECIP 1.0 demonstrates robust prognostic value for assessing treatment outcomes in mCRPC.
- The RECIP 1.0 criteria enhance the evaluation of therapeutic response in prostate cancer.
- Further validation supports the clinical utility of RECIP 1.0 in mCRPC management.
More Related Videos
09:49A Whole Body Dosimetry Protocol for Peptide-Receptor Radionuclide Therapy PRRT: 2D Planar Image and Hybrid 2D+3D SPECT/CT Image Methods
Published on: April 24, 2020
10:28Gene Regulation and Targeted Therapy in Gastric Cancer Peritoneal Metastasis: Radiological Findings from Dual Energy CT and PET/CT
Published on: January 22, 2018