Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2025

06:28
E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
8.2K
Differences between Current Clinical Practice and Evidence-Based Guideline Recommendations Regarding Tocolysis - an
Sabine Enengl1,2, Werner Rath3, Sven Kehl2,4
1Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics, and Gynecological Endocrinology, Kepler University Hospital, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria.
Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde
|January 6, 2025
Summary
Austrian obstetricians show significant gaps in adhering to national guidelines for tocolysis, particularly concerning preterm birth management. This nationwide survey highlights discrepancies between recommended practices and actual clinical application in hospitals.
Area of Science:
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Perinatal Medicine
- Clinical Practice Guidelines
Background:
- National guidelines for preterm birth prevention and therapy (AWMF Guideline 015-025) were implemented in Austria.
- Understanding current clinical practices in tocolysis is crucial for improving maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the adherence of Austrian obstetricians to national guideline recommendations for tocolysis.
- To investigate current practices regarding tocolysis indications, timing, monitoring, drug choice, side effects, and patient discharge recommendations.
Main Methods:
- A nationwide web-based survey was conducted among 78 Austrian obstetric departments between June 5th and August 31st, 2023.
- Data were analyzed descriptively, with Fisher's exact test used for group comparisons.
- The survey focused on practices approximately one year after the guideline's implementation.
Main Results:
- The response rate was 69.2%. Key indications for tocolysis included ≥4 contractions within 20 minutes (48.1%).
- The AWMF Guideline was the primary decision-making support (61.1%). Tocolysis initiation occurred earliest at 23+0 weeks gestation in 35.2% of units.
- Atosiban was the first-line agent (79.6%), followed by nifedipine (13.0%). Maintenance tocolysis was common (90.7%), often based on specific indications.
- Serious side effects were reported by 77.8%, primarily with hexoprenaline use.
Conclusions:
- Significant discrepancies exist between evidence-based tocolysis guidelines and current clinical practice in Austrian hospitals.
- These findings underscore the need for improved guideline implementation and adherence in obstetric care.
- Further research may be warranted to explore reasons for these discrepancies and develop targeted interventions.

