Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 7, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.3K

Incorporating Faculty and Student Co-leadership in Workgroup Structures.

Chitra Kumar1, D J Lowrie2, Tracy Pritchard3

  • 1College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH USA.

Medical Science Educator
|January 6, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

Social Loafing01:37

Social Loafing

34.3K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
34.3K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

8.8K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.8K
Groupthink01:34

Groupthink

43.8K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
43.8K
Levels of Communication II: Organizational, Public, and Group Dynamics01:27

Levels of Communication II: Organizational, Public, and Group Dynamics

1.6K
Effective communication is the foundation of a good organization. Communication is the lifeblood of an organization that connects the group with messages. In an organization, communication occurs in upward, downward, and horizontal lines. Downward communication travels from the administrative and senior levels to the staff through official channels such as manuals, rules and regulations, and organizational charts. Staff members initiate upward communication, which is addressed to executives and...
1.6K
In- and Out-Groups01:31

In- and Out-Groups

38.5K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
38.5K
Robbers Cave04:49

Robbers Cave

14.2K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dynamic Opportunities for Medical Students to Assume the Roles of "Medical Teacher".

Medical science educator·2024
See all related articles

A University of Cincinnati task force used faculty-student co-leadership to address medical school curriculum inequities. This model balanced expertise and student experience, fostering leadership development and diverse perspectives.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Curriculum Development
  • Health Equity

Background:

  • In 2020, the University of Cincinnati College of Medicine established a task force to address curriculum inequities.
  • The task force comprised four workgroups, each with faculty and student co-chairs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe lessons learned from a faculty-student co-leadership model in medical education.
  • To highlight the benefits of diverse perspectives in curriculum reform.

Main Methods:

  • Implementation of a co-leadership model pairing faculty and students in workgroup leadership roles.
  • Focus on balancing subject matter expertise with student lived experiences.

Main Results:

  • The co-leadership model effectively integrated diverse perspectives, addressing faculty-student power dynamics.
Keywords:
Co-leadershipLeadershipMedical education curriculumStudent-led initiatives

More Related Videos

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
13:44

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Published on: December 9, 2022

3.4K
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

1.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 7, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.3K
Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
13:44

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Published on: December 9, 2022

3.4K
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

1.9K
  • Students gained leadership experience, while faculty gained insights into diversity and inclusion.
  • This collaborative approach enhanced the understanding and development of the medical school curriculum.

    • Conclusions:

    • Faculty-student co-leadership offers a valuable framework for addressing inequities in medical education.
    • This model promotes mutual learning, leadership development, and a more inclusive curriculum.
    • The approach successfully balanced pedagogical knowledge with the essential student perspective.