Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
Published on: January 19, 2019
Incorporating Faculty and Student Co-leadership in Workgroup Structures
Chitra Kumar1, D J Lowrie2, Tracy Pritchard3
1College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH USA.
Abstract:
In 2020, the Dean of the University of Cincinnati College of Medicine created a college-wide task force to address inequities in the medical school curriculum. The task force consisted of four workgroups, each co-chaired by a faculty member and a student. This co-leadership model was chosen because it provided diverse perspectives and addressed the typical faculty-student power differentials. This co-leadership model balanced knowledge of medical education curriculum with the student experience. It also provided the opportunity for the co-chairs to take on new roles in leadership development: the student assumed a leadership role running the workgroup with guidance from the faculty member, while the faculty member gained insight and perspective on diversity and inclusion from the student. The purpose of this article is to describe our lessons learned during this co-leadership process.
More Related Videos
13:44Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
Published on: December 9, 2022
06:18The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
Published on: October 20, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Social Loafing
Group Design
Groupthink
Levels of Communication II: Organizational, Public, and Group Dynamics
In- and Out-Groups
Robbers Cave