The correlation between subcutaneous fat thickness and the incidence of chemoport-related infection

Thanaphon Khongyut1, Tanapong Panpikoon1, Chinnarat Buangam1

  • 1Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

PubMed

Insights

Subcutaneous fat thickness did not correlate with chemoport infection rates. Left internal jugular vein insertion increases chemoport dislocation risk.

Area of Science:

  • Medical devices
  • Surgical complications
  • Patient safety

Background:

  • Chemo-ports are essential for long-term intravenous access in cancer patients.
  • Complications associated with chemo-ports can impact patient treatment and outcomes.
  • Understanding risk factors for chemo-port complications is crucial for improving patient care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between subcutaneous fat thickness and chemo-port related infections.
  • To identify risk factors contributing to chemo-port complications, including dislocation, infection, and malfunction.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 363 patients with chemo-port insertion (May 2018-May 2022).
  • Patients stratified into three groups based on subcutaneous fat thickness tertiles measured by CT scan.
  • Analysis of short-term and long-term complication incidence and multivariate analysis of risk factors.

Main Results:

  • No significant correlation found between subcutaneous fat thickness and chemo-port infection incidence (1.7% low, 3.3% middle, 0% high thickness).
  • Overall long-term complication rate was 3.0% after one year, including 1.7% infection and 1.4% dislocation.
  • Left internal jugular vein insertion was a significant risk factor for chemo-port dislocation (OR=9.87, P=0.033).

Conclusions:

  • Subcutaneous fat thickness is not a significant predictor of chemo-port infection.
  • Chemo-port placement via the left internal jugular vein is associated with an increased risk of dislocation.
  • Further research may explore other anatomical or procedural factors influencing chemo-port outcomes.
Abstract