Cost-effectiveness of a multicomponent intervention against cognitive decline
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2025

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment
Published on: September 20, 2020
Christian Brettschneider1, Elżbieta Buczak-Stec1, Melanie Luppa2
1Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, Hamburg Center for Health Economics University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf Hamburg Germany.
Introduction:
The societal costs of dementia and cognitive decline are substantial and likely to increase during the next decades due to the increasing number of people in older age groups. The aim of this multicenter cluster-randomized controlled trial was to assess the cost-effectiveness of a multi-domain intervention to prevent cognitive decline in older people who are at risk for dementia.
Methods:
We used data from a multi-centric, two-armed, cluster-randomized controlled trial (AgeWell.de trial, ID: DRKS00013555). Eligible participants with increased dementia risk at baseline (Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Aging, and Incidence of Dementia/CAIDE Dementia Risk Score ≥ 9), 60-77 years of age, were recruited by their general practitioners, and assigned randomly to a multi-domain lifestyle intervention or general health advice. We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis from the societal perspective. The time horizon was 2 years. Health care utilization was measured using the "Questionnaire for Health-Related Resource Use in Older Populations." As effect measure, we used quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) based on the 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L). We calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves (CEAC) using the net-benefit approach. Exploratory analyses considering women and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS) were conducted.
Results:
Data were available for 819 participants (mean age 69.0 [standard deviation (SD)5-level EQ-5D version 4.9]); 378 were treated in the intervention group and 441 in the control group. The participants in the intervention group caused higher costs (+€445.88 [SD: €1,244.52]) and gained additional effects (+0.026 QALY [SD: 0.020]) compared to the participants in the control group (the difference was statistically significant). The ICER was €17,149.23/QALY. The CEAC showed that the probability of the intervention being cost-effective was moderate, reaching 59% at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) of €50,000/QALY. The exploratory analyses showed promising results, especially in the female subsample.
Discussion:
Considering aspects like the WTP and the limited time horizon, the multi-domain intervention was cost-effective compared to general health advice.
Highlights:
The first German randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluating a multicomponent approach against cognitive decline.We found a favorable incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.The probability of cost-effectiveness reached 78.6%.Women could be an important target group.A longer time horizon is needed.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Alzheimer's Disease: Treatment
Cognitive Enhancers: Cholinesterase Inhibitors and NMDA Receptor Antagonists
Cognitive Development During Adulthood
Alzheimer's Disease: Overview
The clinical diagnosis of AD hinges on the presence of memory and other cognitive impairments. Biomarkers, such as changes in Aβ...
Treatment Strategies for Psychological Disorders
Psychological therapies focus on modifying emotions, thoughts, and behaviors through talking, interpreting, listening, rewarding, challenging, and modeling. Clinical psychologists, counselors, and social workers commonly practice psychotherapy. Clinical...
Negative and Cognitive Symptoms of Schizophrenia
Negative Symptoms
Negative symptoms of schizophrenia manifest as deficits in normal emotional and behavioral functioning, profoundly impacting daily life. Individuals with schizophrenia often display a flat affect, characterized by a near-total absence of emotional expression,...

