Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2025

Biobank for Translational Medicine: Standard Operating Procedures for Optimal Sample Management
Published on: November 30, 2022
Toward a More General Consent for the Use of Patients' Biological Material and Health Information for Medical
Rebecca Bruu Carver1, Matthias Kolberg2, Wenche Reed2
1Department of Communication, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Background: Biological material and health information from patients are valuable for medical research. Under a "broad" consent model, hospital patients in Norway can consent to their biological material and health information being stored in research biobanks and used for "specific, broadly defined research purposes" within a specified medical research area but not for medical research in general. Patients are asked to provide new consent each time researchers wish to use their material in a different medical research area. This study investigated patient representatives' views on having a general consent for medical research without limitation to specific research purposes. We also investigated preferences for the storage of biological samples, the process of consent collection, and factors motivating or hindering consent. Method: An online, anonymous survey was shared with patient representatives from patient advisory councils at hospitals in Norway, who answered the survey on behalf of patients. A total of 157 representatives completed the survey (response rate of 41%). Results: A majority (66.2%) supported general consent for medical research and the use of surplus material for medical research in general (63.7%) without limitation to specific research purposes. A minority (35%) supported the use of surplus material without being informed. Sixty-five percent agreed that biological samples could be stored with no time limitation. Over half (56%) preferred to ask patients to consent prior to a hospital visit, and the majority (70.7%) supported the possibility of choosing between digital or paper consent. Factors motivating consent included the desire to contribute to medical research (89.8%) and faith in scientific progress (24.2%). Main hindrances included the fear that health information may be used for other purposes than research (49%), uncertainty regarding research uses (43.9%), and lack of information (31.8%). Conclusion: A move toward a general consent for medical research may better comply with patients' wishes and maximize research potential.
Background: Biological material and health information from patients are valuable for medical research. Under a "broad" consent model, hospital patients in Norway can consent to their biological material and health information being stored in research biobanks and used for "specific, broadly defined research purposes" within a specified medical research area but not for medical research in general. Patients are asked to provide new consent each time researchers wish to use their material in a different medical research area. This study investigated patient representatives' views on having a general consent for medical research without limitation to specific research purposes. We also investigated preferences for the storage of biological samples, the process of consent collection, and factors motivating or hindering consent. Method: An online, anonymous survey was shared with patient representatives from patient advisory councils at hospitals in Norway, who answered the survey on behalf of patients. A total of 157 representatives completed the survey (response rate of 41%). Results: A majority (66.2%) supported general consent for medical research and the use of surplus material for medical research in general (63.7%) without limitation to specific research purposes. A minority (35%) supported the use of surplus material without being informed. Sixty-five percent agreed that biological samples could be stored with no time limitation. Over half (56%) preferred to ask patients to consent prior to a hospital visit, and the majority (70.7%) supported the possibility of choosing between digital or paper consent. Factors motivating consent included the desire to contribute to medical research (89.8%) and faith in scientific progress (24.2%). Main hindrances included the fear that health information may be used for other purposes than research (49%), uncertainty regarding research uses (43.9%), and lack of information (31.8%). Conclusion: A move toward a general consent for medical research may better comply with patients' wishes and maximize research potential.
Related Concept Videos
Ethics in Research
Ethical Standards II
Nurses are entrusted with upholding various ethical principles and standards. Nurses forge solid therapeutic relationships using trust, empathy, autonomy, confidentiality, and professional competence.
Confidentiality is crucial, embodying respect for individual privacy...
Ethics and Bioethics
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities I
The legal responsibilities of a nurse regarding informed consent include the following:
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...
Ethical Standards I
The Code of Ethics provisions outline the nurse's duty to the patient, the healthcare team, the profession, and society. The Code's fundamental principles include advocacy,...

