Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2025

A Nonviral Approach to Generate Transient Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells Using mRNA for Cancer Immunotherapy
Published on: February 21, 2025
CAR T-cell-associated secondary malignancies challenge current pharmacovigilance concepts
Philipp Berg1, Gabriele Ruppert-Seipp1, Susanne Müller1
1Safety of Biomedicines and Diagnostics, Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Langen, Germany.
Abstract:
Suspected adverse reactions following chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) treatment include more and more cases of secondary T-cell malignancies. The causality assessment of such suspected reactions challenges established evaluation practices due to (i) patient and product-specific risk factors and (ii) incomplete data available with post-marketing reports submitted to competent authorities. This is of particular relevance for gene therapy products that integrate into the host genome. We present a summary of case reports related to different CAR T products and the rationale for case causality assessment. In this context, possible pathophysiologic mechanisms and differences between CAR T products to be taken into account are discussed. The unparalleled complexity of the case follow-up and the multistep process of cancer development necessitates a case-by-case consideration. This highlights challenges in the pharmacovigilance of advanced therapy medicinal products and underlines the importance of testing for vector presence, integration location and gene expression profile for an informed case assessment of suspected secondary malignancies with the aim to obtain a better understanding of contributing factors.
Insights
Secondary T-cell malignancies after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy are a growing concern. Assessing causality is complex due to patient factors and limited data, requiring case-by-case analysis.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Immunotherapy
- Pharmacovigilance
Background:
- Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy has revolutionized cancer treatment.
- Increasing reports link CAR T treatment to secondary T-cell malignancies.
- Established pharmacovigilance methods struggle with causality assessment for these advanced therapies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To summarize case reports of secondary malignancies post-CAR T treatment.
- To discuss the rationale and challenges in causality assessment for these events.
- To explore pathophysiologic mechanisms and product-specific factors influencing risk.
Main Methods:
- Review and summary of existing case reports involving various CAR T products.
- Analysis of causality assessment challenges, considering patient and product-specific factors.
- Discussion of potential pathophysiologic pathways and contributing elements.
Main Results:
- Causality assessment is complicated by patient-specific risks and incomplete post-marketing data.
- Gene therapy products integrating into the host genome present unique challenges.
- A case-by-case approach is essential due to the complexity of cancer development.
Conclusions:
- Pharmacovigilance of advanced therapy medicinal products faces significant hurdles.
- Testing for vector presence, integration site, and gene expression is crucial for accurate assessment.
- Understanding contributing factors is vital for improving the safety of CAR T therapies.
More Related Videos
08:04In Vitro Tumor Cell Rechallenge For Predictive Evaluation of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Antitumor Function
Published on: February 27, 2019
09:34Dynamic Imaging of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells with [18F]Tetrafluoroborate Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography
Published on: February 17, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Tumor Immunotherapy
Cancer Vaccines
Cancer vaccines come in two categories: preventive (prophylactic) and treatment (active). Preventive vaccines, such as the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, protect against viruses that cause certain...
Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity