Related Experiment Videos
Skin conductance responses during spinal analgesia
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
|January 1, 1985
Summary
Spinal analgesia significantly reduced skin conductance responses (SCR), particularly in the foot, indicating sympathetic B-fibers are harder to block than A-fibers. Sympathetic blockade was also shorter-lasting than analgesia.
Area of Science:
- Anesthesiology
- Neuroscience
- Physiology
Background:
- Skin conductance responses (SCR), also known as the sympatho-galvanic reflex, reflect sympathetic nervous system activity.
- Spinal analgesia is commonly used for surgical procedures, but its effects on sympathetic function require further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of spinal analgesia on skin conductance responses (SCR) in patients undergoing transurethral surgery.
- To compare the blockade of preganglionic sympathetic B-fibers versus A-fibers during spinal analgesia.
Main Methods:
- Measured SCR before and during spinal analgesia in 17 patients using electrical stimulation and other stimuli.
- Recorded SCR from various body sites including the hand, T5, T9, T12-L1, and foot.
- Assessed spinal analgesia levels and compared SCR changes with blood pressure variations.
Main Results:
- SCR was markedly depressed in the foot and lower thoracic regions, with less effect on the hand.
- Sympathetic activity reappeared earlier than the regression of analgesia or motor blockade.
- No consistent correlation was observed between blood pressure changes and SCR changes.
Conclusions:
- Preganglionic sympathetic B-fibers are more resistant to blockade by spinal analgesia than A-fibers.
- The duration of sympathetic blockade is significantly shorter than that of analgesia and motor blockade.
- Sympathetic blockade during spinal analgesia may be less extensive than previously reported.